Class Notes (839,092)
Canada (511,185)
INTD 200 (186)
Lecture

Enforcement and Implementation of Human Rights

4 Pages
101 Views

Department
International Development
Course Code
INTD 200
Professor
Warren Allmand

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
Description
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2012: Enforcement and Implementation of Human Rights  Cultural Relativism in the News: a Pakistani girl was shot because she was campaigning for the right of girls to go to school. The Taliban argued the right of girls to go to school was only a Western idea so it does not apply in their country.  Enforcement and Implementation of Human Rights Standards  The aspirations the UN set are great, but enforcement is difficult (which is clear because today we still see gross violations in the Congo, in Cambodia, in Syria, the Roma people in Europe, Aboriginals in Canada, etc.)  How do we enforce these standards?  The first obligation when countries ratify a human rights declaration is to make it law at home (they ratify the declaration and amend their domestic laws to apply to the standards of the treaty).  Some countries also have human rights institutions set up domestically (ex. In Canada there is a federal and provincial human rights commissions, we have the Charter).  Countries would set up national Human Rights Committees to insure that rights were enforced o However, some national committees were “phony” and would always support the government’s position.  “Paris Principles” (passed in 1993 by the general assembly), set standards for human rights institutions at national level.  It must be independent, promote human rights, there must be a process to receive complaints, etc.  How International bodies don’t have the powers to enforced that national bodies do  The UN doesn’t have a standing army  It can just embarrass or diplomatically shun a country  Charter-based enforcement institutions: institutions which flow from the Charter or articles of the United Nations o Some are general (General Assembly sometimes takes up human rights abuses, 3 Committee of General Assembly, Security Council has taken up certain abuses as well (Syria), Secretary General can set up special representatives and can refer matters to the Human Rights Council)  Treaty based enforcement institutions: set up under individual human rights treaties (ex. the committee against torture)  UN Human Rights Council (formerly called UN Commission on Human Rights). There is also a subcommittee for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. The Commission was set up in 1946 before the adoption of the UDHR (they drafted it), and it existed until 2006 when it was replaced by the UN Human Rights Council.  Why was it reformed?  The commission had 53 members appointed for 3 year times and they were elected by ECOSOC. It was supposed to represent the 5 regions of the world, with the Chair rotating between regions. They met for 6 weeks each year (Spring) and it was highly attended. Almost all other countries and some NGOs would attend as observers and could not vote, but could speak (NGOs had a right to intervene with short statements and they could make submissions).  In 2005 Kofi Annan set up a review on the Commission and they recommended reforming it into the Council. The Commission had became dysfunctional and bogged down with conflict between East and West.  There were some good things about the Commission—1503 Resolutions. It allowed private individuals to made direct complaints against countries, and it was a way for citizens to put forward their issues (but they call complaints “communications” and they call their judgment “general comments”).  Also had representatives go to different countries and investigate/condemn violations  How was the new council better?  It continued to use the Commission’s system of thematic rapporteurs who could go to countries to look into and made reports for the Council on the certain issues to which they were assigned. The Council could make a resolution supporting the rapporteur’s comments (of condemnation), but no changes were required.  Ex. Special Rapporteur on Housing came to Canada last year and condemned us on not doing enough for homeless people, indigenous people and people in Northern Canada.  They also have specific country rapporteurs who would be appointed when there was a problem or a lot of complaints about one specific country.  Now, people were put onto the Council be secret ballot (their country had to sign a commitment to ratify as many of the human rights instruments as possible and then they were eligible to be in t
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit