Class Notes (837,435)
Canada (510,273)
INTD 200 (186)
Lecture

Colonialism and the History of Development

4 Pages
73 Views
Unlock Document

Department
International Development
Course
INTD 200
Professor
Karen Mc Allister
Semester
Fall

Description
Colonialism and the History of Development European colonialism - General charac of pre-colonial soc - General b/c e/soc = diff, ranged fr/small subsistence communs to hierarchical kingdoms/states - Physical boundaries around pre-colonial states/socs not territorially based  Often: more imp have control over ppl than over land  Meant boundaries see today in world for diff nats, didn’t exist @that time  Ex: SE Asia: Buddhist areas based on Mendala state  Buddhist cosmology centred on idea of King w/divine rights to rule  No boundaries, ppl part of state b/c either paying tribute/peasants  Ppl gaining b/c being protected fr/other states (lots of slave raiding @this time)  Ex: Thailand current boundaries mapped in response to Brit + Fr trying to control territ  Thailand hired Brit cartographer to map boundaries  Recog that need to protect boundaries otherwise Eur going to take land away - Many boundaries created today = created during colonial time - Colonialism subjugated pops under Eur ideas of rule + what a state should be  Colonialism pre-dates Eur  diff soc did colonize other places (ex: China, Laos, Thailand)  H: Eur colonisation = biggest impact - Colonialism (2 types): colonies of settlement, colonies of rule - Settlement: land taken fr/native ppl (through mili/econ/legal powers) - Rule: colonial administrators re-organised + imposed their rule over diff cultures/soc - Ideologies of justification - Devel modeled after indus rev (19 century) - Can socially engineer societies + necess b/c negative impacts capitalism + indusrev had in Eur  Ex: Enclosure Movement (England)  Many landlords who owned lots of farmland kicked away tenants that were farming on small plots in order to use land for sheep farming  Many tenants displaced, moved to cities, absorbed by textile indus, became labourers  Huge social disintegration that happened alongside this  Created poverty, unhealthy sits, poor labour condits  Many ideas of development that came through colonialist era came through idea of how to manage a similar transit in colonised nats  End point = industrialised nat  Transit justified b/c going to be overall improvement for e/body - “White man’s burden”  Racist attitudes held by Eur @time  ppl in these nats were backwards + trapped in tradit cultures that were preventing them fr/moving towards indusz  Discourse: presented colonialism as positive thing  WMB: proposed that it was responsibility of Eur to impart their culture on non-Eur  Justification for colonialism + made it look like a noble enterprise  Eur saw themselves as superior culture w/better tech, knowl + responsibility to lead + train the colonised ppls (religion, practices of gov + statehood, reorganization of agricul, health services, production, social organization)  Brought in new Eur disciplines (schooling, labour) into these diff nats - Reinforced idea of superiority b/c Eur held control (psych impact) later resisted  Transform socs to fit Eur model + power relation, justify putting power over other ppls Impacts of Colonialism - Displacement, marginalisation, psych impact - Land was taken + enclosed (similar to agricul lands in Brit) for indus production - Psych impact b/c somebody else ruling, idea of ppl being higher up/lower down - Indirect rule - Sys of gov created by Brit + Fr in diff nats  Basically gave tradit native leaders specific authority to rule on behalf of Brit  Local ppl, leaders given privileges in colonial state by colonial gov to reinforce power - In s/cases, other implications b/c ended up w/racialised authority  Certain ethnic grps/leaders given ruling authority over other ethnic grps - Extraction (labour, resources, cultural treasures) - Resources: enriched colonial powers + their interests  Appropriation of local land for cash crops, exports + depriving of ppl of indig rights - Transformation of local agricultural systems - Ppl had very spiritual links to land, farming  Idea of being linked to place can be embedded to local cultures + soc  By displacing ppl fr/their land, displacing ppl fr/link w/place + cultural context - Systems of agricul also livelihoods (pastoralists, hunters + gatherers)  Eur often saw these as backwards, superstitious + perceived customary property rights + fact that ppl not using land as Eur felt was productive/appropriate - Traditional to Eur farming sys (cash crops, monoculture, plantations) - New conception of property + land ownership - Soc + ecological impacts  Displacement of ppl in s/cases created sits of starvation  Ppl no longer growing crops for own consumption (growing cash crops for export)  Environmental impacts: more intensive cropping sys didn’t match ecological context - Transformation/undermining of local industries - Ex: Indian Textile Industry  Well est during pre-colonial times, ppl produce cotton, manufac textiles  Brit imposed high tax on textile indus (tariff for exported textiles)  H: allowed raw cotton imported to Brit tax free  Supp Brit textile indus  undermined Indian textile indus  Flooded India w/cheap cloth made in England  Disruption of craft production in many nats - Colonial division of labour - Extraction of labour + raw materials - Support Eur indusz + developments - Colonies provide markets for manufactured goods shipped backed in
More Less

Related notes for INTD 200

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit