ISLA 210 Lecture Notes - Syriac Orthodox Church, Edward Said

36 views5 pages

lilacrabbit206

19 Jul 2012

School

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Poverty- examples such his difficulty paying for a pencil and notebook, and his family having to sell his new christmas boots to ay for their christmas meal. Can be related how leila ahmed"s assertion that men"s religion is textual religion. Jabra does not make a distinction between how men and women interpret text. Education- his father would stress him staying in school, even if it meant he couldn"t work and contribute to the family expenses. The fact that his brother had to drop out of school but still learns on his own, which shows how much their family value education. Education was a way out and a provider of new opportunities. The focus on language in the rashidiyya school was a secular, nationalist school, and he had to demonstrate his skill in arabic. Class was taking a more important role that religion at this time, and muslims and christians both had to learn arabic.

Related Questions

What are the implications for the international business of differences in the dominant religion, social structure, and educational systems of a country? How do religion, social structure, and education combine to form a system that defines the culture of the country? Give some examples to support your analysis.

ceruleanweasel811

. Vouchers to Pay Private School
Tuition
Two conditions that justify government intervention in a market are the presence of external benefits and equity concerns. Both of these issues are present in the case of primary and secondary education in the United States. Think about what education without government education would look like. In the absence of government intervention, all primary and secondary education in the US would be private. Public school districts would not exist. Parents would need to pay private firms (schools) to educate their children.

External benefits

If all education were private, itâs likely that people would buy too little education, from societyâs point of view. External benefits are one reason. When a child is educated, he or she benefits and we expect his or her parents to take those benefits into account when they purchase education. But there are additional benefits to society which parents may ignore. As people become more educated, they are less likely to be unemployed or be criminals and are more likely to volunteer and vote. The presence of these external benefits is an example in support for the government getting involved in education.

Equity

Many families in the United States have low incomes. Among all children in first through twelfth grades in 2001, 46% were from families with incomes below $40,000. Since the cost of private education would be an important share of these familiesâ incomes, most Americans would be concerned about the fairness of relying on markets to decide how much education children receive. Current spending by these families on private education provides some support for this concern. Of all children in private school in 2001, only 25% were from families with incomes below $40,000. Therefore, equity concerns are another example in support for government getting involved in education.

Providing vs. producing education

Most economists think external benefits and equity concerns justify government intervention in education. But it is important to distinguish between government production of education and other forms of government intervention. At the level of elementary and secondary education, K- 12 education, government intervention today mostly means production of education by local school districts. To benefit, children must attend public schools. But this is not the only form intervention could take.
There are other markets where government intervention takes the form of subsidizing peopleâs access to productsâthink of financial aid to college students, for example. Many people in the US think that government should move from producing education to subsidizing access.

One form that subsidy could take is government providing vouchers to parents. Parents would use the voucher to help pay for their childâs education in a private school. After it receives the voucher, the school would turn it in and be paid by a local or state government.

Today there is a lively debate between people who think K-12 education should be delivered publicly and people who think quality and efficiency would be higher if government provided vouchers and the education was delivered by private schools. Some of these quality and efficiency arguments can be based on material we covered this week. Price competition between private schools will pressure each one to produce efficiently. Competition for students will lead private schools to offer programs of interest to parents and their children.

Answer the questions below and make use of the sources supplied. Be sure to cite you sources in your answers.

1. Explain whether a potential exit by students with vouchers will lead to the improvement of public schools. 2. Discuss whether the implementation of vouchers will lead the best students to leave public school, which could lead to a decline in education for the students left behind in the public schools. 3. Consider what might happen to the students who use vouchers to leave public schools in order to attend private schools. How might their academic performance change as a result of switching? 4. Finally, think about the impact of a voucher system on the students in an urban setting. Describe whether all families would have an equal opportunity to access education.

Your final product will be a paper that: ? Addresses each of the four questions above in total. ? Is APA formatted. ? The body is to be 2 pages minimum.

The requirements for your assignment are: 1. Answer each question fully 2. Define the overall subject of each question. 3. Cite at least three (3) resources from this weekâs materials.

Hello,

Could you please help with the below economics question?

Please provide 5 reasons and examples.

Suppose a school is getting more money from the State for school supplies, including textbooks and computers, as well as an extra budget to use for after-school tutoring. The parents of children at the school hear the news and are planning their budget this year for how much to spend on their children's education, as well as the amount of effort to put in helping their children learn.

Using the language of substitutes and complements, describe how you think the improvements in school finances and expenditure on supplies and after-school tutoring will affect the parent's allocation of time and money for their children's education. Consider also how parents' preferences, parent's utility functions, and household time and budget constraints affect choices regarding how parents might choose to invest in their children's education.

skyporpoise575

ISLA 210 Lecture Notes - Syriac Orthodox Church, Edward Said

Document Summary

Get access

Related Questions