EDKP 443 Lecture Notes - Lecture 14: Impact Factor, Subset

• School: McGill University
• Department: Kinesiology and Physical Ed
• Course: EDKP 443
• Professor: Lindsay Duncan

Document Summary

Without doing a critical analysis, you can get a better indication of if it is good or not. Both target substance use prevention in teams. Decided not to use the same questionnaires because she thought it would be plagiarism; use of measures that don"t mean anything, major flaw in evidence, cannot publish in scientific literature. Evaluation of work by one or more people of similar competence. Maintain standards of quality, improve performance, provide credibility. Better papers get through to the peer review process. 1) researcher writes a paper and submits it to the editor of a journal: pick a journal based on a specific scope; specific leadership. 2) the editor determines whether the article is of sufficient quality and appropriate content. Gives it to the reviewers: just to make it to that stage is a big accomplishment; tells you at least what the editor thinks of your paper.