LING 200 Lecture Notes - Lecture 14: Downward Entailing

39 views3 pages
C-command def:
X commands Y just in case X does not dominate Y, but every node that dominates X dominates
Y.
Dominate def:
A node X dominated Y if you can draw a line going from X to Y always going down
-Tree example:
A dominated all other nodes
B dominated C, D, E, F
M dominates N, K, L, G, I, H, J
N dominates G, I, H, J
G dominates H
A c-commands NOTHING
B c-commands M and what M dominates (N, K, L, G, I, H, J)
C c-commands D, F
N c-commands K, L
K c-commands N and what N dominates (N, G, I, H, J)
Hypothesis 5: An anaphor must be c-commanded by a co-indeed DP in its minimal clause (S)
The DP [ a friend of Emmaā€™s ] c-commands DP [herself]
DP [Emmaā€™s] does not c-command the DP [herself]
There is at least one node (E.g. PP) that dominates [Emma] but not the anaphor
DP [Emmaā€™s friend] c-commands DP [herself]
*Subjects are great antecedents
DP [Emmaā€™s] does not c-command the DP [herself]
-Binding
We call a DP that is c-commanded by a co-indexed DP ā€œboundā€
Binding def:
X binds Y just in case X and Y are co-indexed and
X c-commands Y
Condition on anaphors
Binding condition A:
An anaphor must be bound in its minimal clause (smallest S)
Three things must be satisfied:
Is there a co-indexed DP (an antecedent?)
Does this co-indexed DP c-command the anaphor? (binding?)
Is binder contained in same minimal S node as anaphor ? (locality?)
We call a DP that is c-command by a co-indexed DP ā€œboundā€
Binding def:
X binds Y just in case X and Y are co-indexed and X c-commands Y
Condition on anaphors:
Binding condition A-
An anaphor must be bound in itā€™s minimal clause
(1) *Herself went to Madrid ā€”> no antecedent
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 3 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

X commands y just in case x does not dominate y, but every node that dominates x dominates. A node x dominated y if you can draw a line going from x to y always going down. M dominates n, k, l, g, i, h, j. B c-commands m and what m dominates (n, k, l, g, i, h, j) K c-commands n and what n dominates (n, g, i, h, j) Hypothesis 5: an anaphor must be c-commanded by a co-indeed dp in its minimal clause (s) The dp [ a friend of emma"s ] c-commands dp [herself] Pp) that dominates [emma] but not the anaphor. Dp [emma"s] does not c-command the dp [herself] We call a dp that is c-commanded by a co-indexed dp bound . X binds y just in case x and y are co-indexed and. An anaphor must be bound in its minimal clause (smallest s) Does this co-indexed dp c-command the anaphor? (binding?)

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions