Class Notes (834,153)
Canada (508,381)
POLI 222 (116)
Lecture 9

Lecture 9 electoral systems.odt

3 Pages
98 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POLI 222
Professor
Christa Scholtz
Semester
Winter

Description
Electoral Systems Elections Why care at all about elections? – Democratic Legitimacy – Reveal Democratic preferences – Accountability It is the voters chance to voice their opinion and vote for a party whom they believe will best represent their interests in parliament. If we don't care, elections become a way for people to legitimize themselves someway. Why care about specific electoral rules? – Cairns 1968: The electoral system is to the politician like the price system is to the business person – Electoral rules translate votes into seats – create distortions The key thing to realize that no translation is perfect. When you change the votes into seats, there will be distortions. The best we can do is approximate through the rules we create.As citizens you are electing between different menus of distortions. You have to chose the menu you believe is the least bad or the one you believe has the proper distortions. How to pick between electoral rules? – which is best? Those who are in charge are those who have one under the existing system, this is what makes it difficult to change the system because no winning party wants to change the system which allows them to succeed. British Columbia has had a referendum to change the election system however it failed just as in Ontario and PEI. The example of success is New Zealand, they have moved from our system to a mixed proportion system, they recently had another referendum and decided to continue with the new system. Proportional or Non-Proportional Non-Proportional – winner takes allegiance – Plurality rule (FPTP/SMP) – who do I like the most – Majority rule – Run off (you have a number of elections, if no candidate has a majority, you have another election) – preferential voting (IRV[instant run off voting]/AV) – Usually single member districts – Pure FPTP: (first past the post) – Canada – USA – Majoritarian – French Presidential Election (run off, rank your candidates) Majority: you need at least 50% plus 1Plurality: you need more votes than the next candidate Pros and Cons: You will get a majority government with a plurality rule election. If you care about representation this is a problem but it is not if what you want is stability. Direct line of accountability between MP and voter. Plurality systems reward geographic support. Major parties become regional parties and not a green party (winning seats under a non proportional system than under a proportional system) con is the idea of strategic voting, the voter does not vote for his first preference. Voting for someone to ensure the party you do not like does not win. The problem is that elections are supposed to reveal voter preferences, this system does not. Proportional – Allocate seats in
More Less

Related notes for POLI 222

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit