Class Notes (838,375)
Canada (510,867)
POLI 227 (298)
Rex Brynen (112)
Lecture

FEBRUARY 8.docx

3 Pages
96 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POLI 227
Professor
Rex Brynen
Semester
Winter

Description
FEBRUARY 8, 2012: Informal Groups: Not all of the groups that are relevant have names, offices, etc. especially in the developing world where things are less institutionalized.  Horizontal → “old boys” networks with disproportionate roles in societies Individuals with the same positions in society, usually elite positions. Associations of large landowners co-operating and acting as a lobby; army officers have personal and political linkages of enduring importance throughout their lives; self-help soup kitchens in an urban slum ex) Kuwaiti vs. Jordanian business associations. Kuwaiti organization was much more powerful because they were more exclusive and only let in powerful business owners, whereas in Jordan it was very open, but the big business don’t want to be bogged down by the small businesses and would lobby government privately.  Communal → ethnic, religious or secretarian groups May have its own formalized leadership, mobilized ethnicities. “You don’t need a membership card to be heard.” There is a sense of identity.  Vertical → patron-client relations Vertical groups cut across social class. There is an exchange of security for support. They are exploitative and unequal, and involve trading, support for benefits, and may even be popular within the country. ex) Drug cartel in Columbia would finance children’s sports teams, charitable organization, etc. and some of the cartel leaders were more popular than the Columbia state. The citizens then wouldn’t cooperate with the state’s narcotics investigations. The “Glue”: How do you hold groups together? Ideas:  Shared ideas may knit together a political coalition (ideology→ ideas formulated into how society is, a blueprint or a model; political culture→ social identity, authority, legitimacy) Sources of political socialization  ex) family (ex. Strongest indicator of how you vote and other cues is how your parents vote), peer, religion (state may try to influence this, but that is difficult because there is a higher political cost to arresting priests than citizens, there is already a doctrine), school (US is a model of creating a single national identity reflected in the school system, in authoritarian societies this goes past this), work, mass media (can be censored in authoritarian regimes, this is harder to do now→ social networking) Resources:  General, diffuse benefits (as diffuse as “let’s overthrow the regime and get a democracy,” it could be a psychological benefit from belonging to a larger group)  Specific benefits (patron-client relationships are about specific benefits)  Patron client relations + state resources = neopatrimonialism (state elites are using resources informally to cement political support) *they can’t secure loyalty if everyone has access to the resources (needs to be exclusive) ex) How to get running water in a rural town: applying and waiting for the bureaucratic structure to implement it (institutional way), or you use social networking and have a personal connection with someone in democracy (informal connections, usually family), or joining to your local MP who is a member of the governing party and expressing your support for the regime and the MP will get you way you want (patron-client relations with the expectation that the person will be
More Less

Related notes for POLI 227

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit