POLI 227 Lecture Notes - Short, Sharp Shock, Sub-Saharan Africa, Debt Relief

23 views5 pages

Document Summary

March 16th, 2012: political consequences of saps (continued) The change in policy will always create winners and losers. Imf riots- often associated with cutting food subsidies or heating subsidies. Shift in political coalitions- this can happen if the government decides to change economic policies (gains new allies, loses old supporters), or if a new government is brought it. Weakening of neo-patrimonialism because there are fewer state resources to spend. You can use the sell off of state assets as a type of neopatrimonialism and use economic liberalization to hand out the benefits of economic liberalization. (ex. Gradual (less likely to cause political opposition, but does not send signals about your determination to shift economic direction) vs. short, sharp shock (better economically, but not politically) Egypt is an example of the gradual implementation. Bread is egypt is very cheap because it is subsidized, which was a heavy drain on resources.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions