Class Notes (839,092)
Canada (511,185)
POLI 244 (357)

POLI244 Lecture Notes Nov 12th.docx

4 Pages

Political Science
Course Code
POLI 244
Jason Scott Ferrell

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
POLI244 Lecture Notes Nov 12th  Announcements: o Conferences next week are cancelled o Put your TA’s name of the cover of your paper Terrorism:  Different ways of thinking about terrorism  Difficult to define  How do you study it?  General theoretical definition of Terrorism: o A tactic of sorts (similar to other tactic offered by Shelling, threats and coercion) that involves violence o What are the political goals? (broadly)  To try and bring (coercive) pressure on governments or states by applying force on the civilians. o It can be intelligible, not random killing, but for a purpose. o Historically not confined to one area of the world (Europe, Russia) o Not limited to any ideology  More specific definition of Terrorism: o Politically motivated violence against non-combatants by non-state actors, to evoke psychological fear. o The use of force to oppose the status quo o This definition is contested because it can be argued that states use this type of force to coerce their own population. o Meant to push us to consider the ends and means of violence, especially non- conventional conflict. o Ends and means of war that is not necessarily between states (Guerilla warfare, implied to be endorsed by military and political actors is not terrorism, although there is an overlap with the individuals who are involved, one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter) o Terrorists are sometimes transnational actors, but not always. This blurs the boundaries and makes it difficult to address the issues.  What are the weapons/tactics? o A weapon of the weak, an asymmetrical form of warfare.  What is the difference between this type of violence and state violence? o Legitimacy o States often coerce non-combatants o Think about the different theories explain or deal with the idea of terror?  Constructivism: issues of legitimacy,  If seen as Intelligible Violence: o A rational strategy. o Has a particular objective (to change policy in government) o When is it appropriate to use?  When the terror group faces an overwhelming opponent (asymmetrical warfare)  If the target government is responsive to its citizens o The terror organization has a very small constituency (hence why it is asymmetrical violence) o Is almost a form of bargaining. (remember what we have already seen) A signal to opponent what your goal is, then coercively force them to meet your needs (Fearon,
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.