Class Notes (835,494)
Canada (509,211)
POLI 244 (357)
Lecture

nov 5 lecture IPE continued.docx

5 Pages
129 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POLI 244
Professor
Jason Scott Ferrell
Semester
Fall

Description
IPE continued 11/5/2012 1:32:00 PM Trade  Different advantages that lead states into trade and exchange. There are also issue of trade restriction. Why do states still have protectionism if they know that free trade is better? For explicit reasons for trade barriers. Sometimes they protect domestic level producers, or they protect infant industries. They can also prefer to trade with states with shared cultural and political attributes. there can be factor based preferences. The idea is that in some sense free trade is most beneficial for factors that are most abundant in a state. They promote liberal economic policies. Owners of scare factors will tend to try to promote protectionist policies because they are not competitive and will be wiped out. Within these sectors, if you have a factor that is unproductive, everyone will be for protectionism, regardless of social standing (owner, manager, worker, etc) This cuts at Marxism by saying that it is not class interest that determines interest in free trade. Studies show that class interest is actually not that sharp. In terms of who is able to have influence over trade, part has to do with how institutions are arranged, and how quickly they can mobilize political organizations. How does this relate to IR? Economic trade can be seen analogously to the Prisoner’s dilemma. States have incentives to defect or not cooperate with others. According to certain concerns, some states have incentives to erect trade barriers. The basic idea from the analogy is that trade competiton, if unregulated, can lead lead to sub-optimal outcomes. If trade is supposed to be for mutual benefit actors have incentives to look for other things, and everyone is less well off. There is also an issue of uncertainty that arises at the system level. States seem to have an incentive to behave in non-cooperative manners. states have an incentive to not cooperate. One thing that becomes clear is that there is a potentially political dimension to issues of economic trade. This profoundly affects how economics works at the international level. theoretically, if states engaged in international trade in the way that you would expect things would be okay. But domestic level actors have divergent interests about protectionism, and sometimes protectionist groups are more politically powerful than others. there are also other considerations. Pay attention to Gilpton. There is a strong tie between wealth and power. The idea is that wealth is fungible, you can turn it into other things which can create power. The way that a state uses its wealth, measured in terms of resources or trade potentially affects its security, or its relative power. The security dilemma is measured by the economic standing of nations. Power isn’t just how many soldiers that you can have, but also how many economic powers you have.
More Less

Related notes for POLI 244

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit