Class Notes (834,037)
Canada (508,290)
POLI 244 (357)
Lecture

The International Political Economy.docx

4 Pages
92 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POLI 244
Professor
Mahesh Shankar
Semester
Summer

Description
WEDNESDAY, JULY 25, 2012: The International Political Economy  Over time, interactions related to economic issues have become increasingly important because many believe greater economic cooperation can be the source of international peace and security (this argument was first made before WWI).  Barriers to trade and commerce were broken down by technology and communications, making the world more interdependent.  The end of the Cold War was significant for the political economy because it represented the prevailing of capitalism as former communist countries began to turn to capitalism. It makes economic cooperation more possible and more likely as states opened up their economies.  Political economy is the study of how politics impacts states and how economic interests and developments impact the nature of politics (changing distributions of wealth and power essential to international conduct).  The focus on the political economy is based on a fundamental debate about what the relationship between the two spheres is. It is a debate over which of the two is most important, which comes firsts, and which supersedes the other. They are not isolated from each other and shaped each other in meaningful ways.  There are three ways the relationship between economics and politics has been conceived: 1. Mercantilism—the domain of international politics is like for realists the domain of conflict. The primary actors in the economic system are states, which have their own interests of security, power, economic dominance, and wealth. The fundamental interest of states is maximizing their interest, which means all relations which other states will be conflicting. States care about relative gains and think in zero sum terms. This means politics dominates and determines economic policy. 2. Economic Liberalism is the dominant doctrine. Adam Smith made this famous. This underlies the capitalist free trade global economy. They believe national interest is essentially the same as the economic interest in society. It argues that the pursuit of each state and material wealth is not a zero sum or relative gains issue. They believe they are positive sum or absolute gains, where everyone can gain together and everyone’s economic interests can be met. This means there can be harmonious relations. The logic is of comparative advantage (Adam Smith, David Ricardo), which means specialization and trade makes everyone better off. David Ricardo applied this to trade between countries, moving it from the domestic level to the international realm (restricting trade=wasting resources). Contrary to mercantilism, it would be better if economics superseded politics, and policy should be about protecting free trade. 3. Marxism—there is no harmony of interest between classes because they all aim to maximize their class interest, which are all zero sum in nature (the gain of one class is the loss of another). The ruling classes seek to continue their ownership and control over the lower classes while the working classes have an eventual incentive to overthrow the ruling class. Economics drives politics because what class controls the economic system determines the nature of the political system. They take this logic from the domestic level and apply it to the international level. There are similar class distinctions internationally- the wealthy countries with all the power vs. the poor developing countries with natural resources and cheap labour (North vs. South). Rich capitalism states seek to keep getting richer and do this by exploiting the poor states. The poorer countries seek to be in the higher levels of development when they own capital, but find themselves to become perennial sources of raw materials and little else (*dependency theory).  Global free trade: the assumption that free trade is good is a liberal notion. With this assumption (the broad understanding in today’s international system), how do we achieve this? Particularly in a world where some assert we are functioning in a domain of relative gains. How dependent you are on another state directly determines the amount of power they have on you.  Why do we have a free trade system when incentives aren’t necessarily there?  Hegemonic stabilities theory—the hegemon has an incentive to create a global free trade economy, so it provides a support system for such an economy to exist. A liberal international economy requires a dominant power to manage and stabilize the system, and this power must see benefit in doing so. They have an incentive because as the dominant economic force, it is most likely to profit most from having a free trade global economy. Because it is wealthiest and most powerful, it is also less worried about relative gains so can promote an absolute gains system. The hegemon has an incentive because assuming everyone is better off, the other states being satisfied means the hegemon’s dominance can be maintained for longer. The hegemon uses its economic and military power to provide public goods, which are necessary for the functioning of a liberal free trade economy.  State trade policies: in reality states make choices between fr
More Less

Related notes for POLI 244

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit