Class Notes (836,321)
Canada (509,732)
POLI 322 (59)
Lecture

POLI 322 sept 28.docx

5 Pages
77 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POLI 322
Professor
Narendra Subramanian
Semester
Fall

Description
POLI 322 – Lecture Notes September 28, 2012 LEGACIES OF PAKISTAN MOVEMENT AND PARTITION -forced migration -Muslim League, national identity weak -varied expectations of postcolonial period -public role of religion in Pakistan uncertain -decline in status of Indian Muslims -association between state boundaries and religious boundaries -Pakistan was created at the last minute; contributing factor to lack of national identity -contributed to part of the country splitting off in 1971 to form Bangladesh -after independence, Muslim League became dominant party in Pakistan, as did Congress in India -Muslim League became a mass organization relatively late in its history -didn’t have strong party institutions -had been stronger for longer in Muslim minority reasons which remained in India -even its leaders were mostly people who migrated from what became India to what became Pakistan -so the leaders had shallow roots in the country -contributed to the party disintegrating relatively quickly -Pakistan movement was such that the status of religion was unstable -when Jinnah took over he said he wanted to create a secular state -however, the League had gained support from various groups who wanted focus to be on certain religious groups -sharp decline in the Muslim share of the population in India  went from about 28% to 11% -Muslims did not gain much in socioeconomic power -in some regions of India, it even declined further as a result of discrimination from state officials -tensions between religious groups and tensions between these 2 neighbouring countries -some talk nostalgically about other possible outcomes had India and Pakistan not partitioned -those who feel this way in Pakistan have very different view from those who feel that way in India AUTHORITARIANISM IN PAKISTAN: OVERVIEW -periods of outright authoritarian rule: 1958-71, 1977-88, 1999-2008 -periods of civilian rule (semi-democracy): 1947-58, 19771-77, 1988-99, 2008-12 -some of the time elections were held but they were not entirely free elections -lots of opponents didn’t participate in these elections -through the periods of civilian rule, the experiences varied -1947-58: no elections  1947-51: elections were held based on about 20% of the adult population being able to vote; Muslim League won a majority  1951-58: wasn’t even elected leaders who were most powerful; it was unelected bureaucrats who became the governor generals (and in some cases military generals)  1954: elections were held for state assemblies, but governments that were established were dismissed in less than 2 years -1971-77: about as democratic as Pakistan got  ran by Pakistan People’s Party (established after the decline of the Muslim League)  Came to power in not the most straightforward way  1970 elections: 2 parties did very well (Awami League did well in East, PPP did well in West)  Awami League won overall  But by 1971 PPP had the majority  elections in 1977 were rigged; signified that things weren’t in fact so democratic -1988-99: elected governments came to power  however, an unelected president originally had some authority to dismiss governments  no government stayed in power for its full period in office  popular engagement with democracy weakened, voter turnout declined, and civil rights were violated -2008-12: elections were held by previous dictatorship  elected national assembly put pressure on the current president and got him to leave  elected officials came to power  future of the regime is still uncertain REASONS FOR EMERGENCE OF FIRST DICTATORSHIP -colonial experience of autocracy/representative government -party weakness -approach to state-building -foreign aid channeled through bureaucracy and military -selective ethnic inclusion -indecision over basic features of polity -under colonial rule, West Pakistan was one of the last regions that the British colonized -British were very aware of a competition with Russians over getting various regions of what’s now Pakistan/Afghanistan -being aware of this competition, the British made their governance in regions which are now Pakistan very authoritative and militant -much more of Pakistan was composed of princely states where elections were not conducted -most of the power was concentrated in West Pakistan -Muslim League had a short history and weaker roots -less cohesion -didn’t help that soon after independence Jinnah died -much harder to consolidate the Muslim League as a political power -most of the major state institutions were inherited by India rather than Pakistan  Delhi was the capital of India, so India inherited the buildings etc. that were in the capital -there was more work to be done in Pakistan than in India -what made a difference was which institutions took to state building -in Pakistan, since parties were w
More Less

Related notes for POLI 322

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit