Class Notes (835,730)
Canada (509,354)
POLI 346 (41)
Lecture

US and Europe.docx

4 Pages
76 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Science
Course
POLI 346
Professor
Mark Brawley
Semester
Fall

Description
The US and Europe: Revolving Relations 14/10/2012 16:16:00 Europe as a Priority  in 1945, debates over where American priorities lay  but after ‘loss’ of China, that debate is somewhat settled - recognized as a real loss because China is recognized for its potential - a lot of finger pointing - NSC 68  shifted perception of Soviet Union; colouring perception of China  they become allies in 1949/1950  settles the debate, Europe should be important, and Japan in Asia - what do the Europeans need? what do the Americans expect in return? - how should the US deal with Europe?  the answers reflect changes in American grand strategy Post-War Europe  divided between East and West - Germany itself is divided  Soviets want it to remain unindustrialized, and not recover from the war, redrawing the Eastern borders  the United States think they have learned their lesson, fighting to have Germany reintegrated  French, British and American occupied areas work together (West Germany)  Britain, France, Italy, Belgium, Netherlands all struggle to recover (much more localized damage in WWI than in WWII due to more fluid fronts and different methods of warfare in the latter)  much bigger mess than what was left after WWI  how do you go from war time production back to peace time production? it was a huge problem after WWI  each still trying to hold onto own roles - Britain and France are broke, losing their lead roles in the international sphere  dollar shortage (USDs)  the currency everyone wants - European firms cannot compete with American firms, hard for Europe to get USDs through trade  Truman Doctrine - directed funds to the most threatened (by Soviet invasion/influence) only  Greece and Turkey - focus is more intently on west (as opposed to China) General George Marshall  envied for his intelligence  butted heads with certain members of the military  regardless people listened to his ideas  he is patient, he explains things, he deals with the whole picture  there to make important decisions during the war  US Army Chief of Staff 1939-1945 (Roosevelt) - Marshall wanted to be in battle, President wanted him by his side for advising  Secretary of State 1947-49 (Truman)  Secretary of Defense 1950-51 (following NSC 68)  associated with ‘the Marshall Plan’ The Marshall Plan  following the Truman Doctrine, wants Marshall to be the one to ask Congress for money, he will best explain the plan to offer economic support to Western Europe  US funds to be offered with conditions: - recipients must agree to engage in economic planning  they have to justify how they are spending the money (infrastructure, agriculture, etc.)  provides information on how plans in different countries will mesh together = coordinated effort across the countries - recipient must agree to coordinate exchange rates  artificial deflation of currencies against the USD was recommended  eliminated the need for USDs to trade between European countries and it improved the trade status of European countries to the US
More Less

Related notes for POLI 346

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit