Class Notes (1,000,000)
CA (610,000)
McGill (30,000)
POLI (3,000)
POLI 212 (200)
Lecture

POLI 212 Lecture Notes - Incomes Policy, Presidential System, Indicative Planning


Department
Political Science
Course Code
POLI 212
Professor
Hudson Meadwell

This preview shows half of the first page. to view the full 3 pages of the document.
MARCH 26, 2012:
Kitschelt
Liberal Social Democratic Conservative Republican
Van der Burg
Liberal Median Voter Republican
How can we explain the success of the new right in the European cases?
For Norris, that breaks down into explaining too things. Variations in levels of
support between cases and to account for political forms in which support for the
new right is expressed in politics. She is developing a politically specific argument
about the importance of electoral systems for the way that the new right is
expressed in European politics, through supply side factors. She is criticizing
society-centred explanations.
She wants to criticize arguments that think of the new right as emerging to mobilize
losers in the transition from industrial to post-industrial economies and societies.
Second, she wants to challenge explanations for the mergence of the new right that
are focused on the new right as a response to increasing levels of immigration and
the development of policies of multiculturalism.
She wants to challenge/fine tune explanations that think of the new right as a
nativist response to immigration. These are demand side explanations.
She is claiming that these kinds of factors are relatively constant across cases so
cannot explain variations in support or organization across parties.
When she turns to the political side of the explanation, she criticise arguments
based in spatial models of party competition. In particular, she criticizes the
Kitschelt model and the Van der Burg model (the continuums above). Parties are
located on these left-right dimensions and there are two explanations for under
what conditions under which the new right will do better.
The Kitschelt is an argument about the relatively location of a social democratic
party and a conservative party. The smaller the distance between those two
parties, the greater the opening for a party of the new right to form to the right of
the traditional conservative party.
The Van der Burg argument is based around the location of the conservative party.
The closer the conservative party is located to the median voter, the more
opportunity there is for a party of the new right to emerge.
Median voter is the voter in the electorate who divides the electorate into two
equal halves.
Their spatial models think that the parties are defined by the structural makeup of
the electorate.
Norris wants to draw attention to the importance of political institutions (the
electoral rules of the game), which have a substantial impact on variation and
support and on political organization.
The spatial model tells us that the only strategic incentives parties respond to are
the dimensions of voters on the spectrum. She is arguing that parties do respond to
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version