Class Notes (839,469)
Canada (511,354)
Psychology (3,335)
PSYC 213 (227)
Lecture 9

cognition lecture 9

15 Pages
79 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYC 213
Professor
Daniel J Levitin

This preview shows pages 1,2,3. Sign up to view the full 15 pages of the document.
Description
February 4 , 2010 Lecture 9 CHAPTER FIVE: MEMORY In our book there are two chapters about memory. The one that we will deal with today is memory traces and memory schemas, and the next one is memory systems (or something like that). Today we will talk about traces versus schemas. We are going to try and distinguish between physical traces of memory and recollection of memory, and how we remember events. In the next class, we will deal with memory systems and hopefully amnesias. We can look at the dissociations of different memory systems. Before we start, we saw a short video (the significance of this will be described later): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7EpYlKaBM8 Defining memory is not that difficult. We do not have the same problem that we had with attention. Memory is the study of how we encode information, retrieve it and remember past events. Memory is also about remembering future events, for example remembering that the next midterm is on March 2 . This is forward memory. It is also the study of forgetting. How do we forget? How fast do we forget? What do we retain? Related to forgetting are amnesias, what contributes to them, what kind of memory systems we have. Before starting, we need to look at a history of memory and memory research. One of the most prominent figures in memory research Is Herman Ebbinghaus. He was a part of associationalism. This was in the 1980s. They were concerned with how events become associated with one another to result in learning. Ebbinghaus was the first to start examining memory experimentally. He developed a tool for studying memory called the nonsense syllable method. In those days, they didnt have large subject participation pools, so he basically studied himself. He developed a list of nonsense syllables that could be something like hun, veg, zaf, her. He used nonsense syllables because he was interested in studying things that were novel to us, that have no semantic meaning. He gave himself a list of these syllables and studied them, and then attempted to recall them. One of the main contributions of this method is that it helped establish experimental methodology of memory. He varied the number of syllables on the list, and introduced a retention interval. A retention interval is the time interval between when you learn a list and when you are asked to recall it. Using these simple tasks, some of the key properties of memory were established back in the 1800s: Difficulty will increase disproportionately with list length. When you have a short list it is easy to remember. When you have a longer list its more difficult. When you have extremely long lists, these are even hard to remember. That was one of they key findings. Amount of retention. How much you actually remember. Depends on the level of learning. If you read the list once, your retention will not be very good. If you learn it over and over again, your retention is going to be much better for that list of items. In the book, this is related to the concept of levels of processing that was put forward a number of years later where they proposed that the more deeply encoded the information is, the more easily it is remembered. (See textbook p. 131) Its called exceptional memory by professor Aitken; he was a brilliant mathematician as well as an accomplished violinist. He could remember all kinds of things. We should read this. The mechanism by which he was able to remember a number of information was deep encoding. He would allow himself to become extremely interested in the material he was learning, or he would force himself to become interested in the material he was learning. Not all material is interesting. For example, the nonsense syllabi are very boring. If you can make it interesting for yourself that will aid your retention; you will remember it better. Postulated that distributed learning = better retention. You will remember much more if you learn over time versus if you cram. Thats another good aid for studying in exams. This is what professors try to do in courses by giving you midterms, forcing distributed learning. Your retention would be better once you have gone through the material repeatedly over months. Based on these findings, he also established: The forgetting curve. This was done in 1885 and it still holds quite nicely and can be replicated. (See textbook fig 5.12). What you see on the y-axis is what people remember. On the x-axis is the interval between original learning. What you can see is that there is rapid forgetting within the first hour, but then the curve gradually tapers off. If you retain something 8 hours after learning, there is a good chance that its going to last. This is Ebbinghaus. He is widely considered as the father of memory and memory research. One of his main view is that he viewed memory as storage. Memories are entities that exist somewhere, and all we need to do is go and retrieve them. Throughout the years, there were a number of metaphors that were put forward to help us understand how to study memory. We have been there in attention, and seen that they are metacognition
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1,2,3 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit