Class Notes (905,180)
CA (538,373)
McGill (32,505)
PSYC (3,674)
PSYC 215 (508)
Lecture

Lecture 38.pdf

5 Pages
48 Views

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYC 215
Professor
Donald Taylor

This preview shows pages 1-2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
PSYCH 215 Lecture Dec 2
Behavior in Small Groups
Social psychologists that study aggression and consider it their field; missing
most important part
Aggression is behavior every society worries about because they don’t like
aggression
Why would anyone be aggressive then? If every society has a norm, that says
aggression is bad, why do we even have a topic? It means people are
breaking the norm, they’re being aggressive
Sexual behavior is aggression. Every society worries about it, why? Because
society has norms about how and when you should practice it. People seem
to break it regularly
Thus, aggression and sexually are always BIG issues in society including our
own
Because society has well defined norms about aggression, need to look at
norms to determine what to do about it
Means all of us have some aggression in us that we would actually break the
norm, and be aggressive, so much so that we do it anyways
When society says don’t be aggressive and we keep being aggressive, means
aggression and sexual behavior is hardwired in us and hard to stop
EX. Blue shirt- if society says don’t wear it, you don’t. Not the same as
aggression and sexuality
We need to learn how to motor behavior
Tension tells us there is something very basic about aggression- tied up with
social reality, norms- that’s where we learn about them
Every text book always has a chapter on aggression followed immediately by
altruism
Altruism: natural tendency of people to be nice, to be good
So social psychology wants to be balanced- aggression, negative then
altruism= positive
All altruism chapters begin with a story: ought to make us really perplexed,
usually start- Kitty Jenevis, young woman living in high rise in NYC, walking
home was attacked and stabbed with a knife- people on their balconies
watched this and did nothing, the guy who stabbed her ran away and then
came back and continued to stab her, people continued to watch and did
nothing
o Why did no one come to help when this person was in trouble?
o EX. Chinese girl, lying there and people walk by not caring, some
vehicle ran over her, backed up and did it again- WENT Viral
o Where’s the altruism? What’s happened to out values, how could we
let this happen?
o Chapter that’s supposed to be good, first question, how come we don’t
help anyone? Trying to find something good, but trying to find how
come we are not altruistic
o First experiments- why did no one come to help Kitty? How come we
are all so not altruistic?
o Lead to experiments- Jim Darly at Yale, fascinated by why people
didn’t help, scream or phone 911, in basement of Yale, had a lab, took
some money from his grant and divided lab to make 2 rooms with
door, one room looked like waiting room, and then other room into
real lab
o Jim set up this scenario to study kitty phenomenon, wanted to do pilot
testing, recruited students to come one at a time to go through
procedure to see if it worked, at Ohio state he got student
o Student comes, have a seat in waiting room while we set up, the
assistant in lab takes dry ice which makes smoke, put the dry ice by
the door, smoke into waiting room, screams FIRE, what’s the guy in
the waiting room going to do? Help or not help?
o Fundamental flaw was by BAD LUCK the student for pilot study, was
linebacker, he sat in waiting room, football player knocks the door
down, experiments thus don’t always work the first time
o Believable situation- linebacker acted, Jim’s experiment involved in
half the conditions, 1 student in waiting room, in other conditions, 4
or 5 students in waiting room, dry ice and yell fire, measure reaction
o To everyone’s surprise, when there is 1 person in waiting room, high
probably that person is going to try to do something about the crisis,
when 4 or 5 less chance they’ll do anything
o In Kitty’s situation, typically the case- people watch but don’t do
anything, if one person there and doesn’t do anything= bad person
o Darly’s insight, part of the issue, a lot of you, don’t do much. WHY?
o People were rocked by Kitty incident and experiments and started to
wonder about scenario- so went back to Kitty situation and spoke to
some who were on their balconies and watched
o In all cases, they felt awful, all said they assumed someone else had
called 911- but if everyone’s thinking that then nobody did
o If alone, can’t assume anyone else- either you’ll do something or no
one will
o Same as Chinese situation
o EX. If you have 100 people walking on St. Caths, and there’s a guy lying
there, most would not stop, if someone does kneel down, there’s 99
other people who walked by- what’s normal is to walk by, the guy who
stops is abnormal= NORM, unless first person stops and everyone else
follows suit, abnormal
o For 1 person who stops, 100 others don’t- norm is that you don’t stop
How do groups influence us?
Part of social psychology bridges individual and society

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
PSYCH 215 Lecture Dec 2 Behavior in Small Groups  Social psychologists that study aggression and consider it their field; missing most important part  Aggression is behavior every society worries about because they don’t like aggression  Why would anyone be aggressive then? If every society has a norm, that says aggression is bad, why do we even have a topic? It means people are breaking the norm, they’re being aggressive  Sexual behavior is aggression. Every society worries about it, why? Because society has norms about how and when you should practice it. People seem to break it regularly  Thus, aggression and sexually are always BIG issues in society including our own  Because society has well defined norms about aggression, need to look at norms to determine what to do about it  Means all of us have some aggression in us that we would actually break the norm, and be aggressive, so much so that we do it anyways  When society says don’t be aggressive and we keep being aggressive, means aggression and sexual behavior is hardwired in us and hard to stop  EX. Blue shirt- if society says don’t wear it, you don’t. Not the same as aggression and sexuality  We need to learn how to motor behavior  Tension tells us there is something very basic about aggression- tied up with social reality, norms- that’s where we learn about them  Every text book always has a chapter on aggression followed immediately by altruism  Altruism: natural tendency of people to be nice, to be good  So social psychology wants to be balanced- aggression, negative then altruism= positive  All altruism chapters begin with a story: ought to make us really perplexed, usually start- Kitty Jenevis, young woman living in high rise in NYC, walking home was attacked and stabbed with a knife- people on their balconies watched this and did nothing, the guy who stabbed her ran away and then came back and continued to stab her, people continued to watch and did nothing o Why did no one come to help when this person was in trouble? o EX. Chinese girl, lying there and people walk by not caring, some vehicle ran over her, backed up and did it again- WENT Viral o Where’s the altruism? What’s happened to out values, how could we let this happen? o Chapter that’s supposed to be good, first question, how come we don’t help anyone? Trying to find something good, but trying to find how come we are not altruistic o First experiments- why did no one come to help Kitty? How come we are all so not altruistic? o Lead to experiments- Jim Darly at Yale, fascinated by why people didn’t help, scream or phone 911, in basement of Yale, had a lab, took some money from his grant and divided lab to make 2 rooms with door, one room looked like waiting room, and then other room into real lab o Jim set up this scenario to study kitty phenomenon, wanted to do pilot testing, recruited students to come one at a time to go through procedure to see if it worked, at Ohio state he got student o Student comes, have a seat in waiting room while we set up, the assistant in lab takes dry ice which makes smoke, put the dry ice by the door, smoke into waiting room, screams FIRE, what’s the guy in the waiting room going to do? Help or not help? o Fundamental flaw was by BAD LUCK the student for pilot study, was linebacker, he sat in waiting room, football player knocks the door down, experiments thus don’t always work the first time o Believable situation- linebacker acted, Jim’s experiment involved in half the conditions, 1 student in waiting room, in other conditions, 4 or 5 students in waiting room, dry ice and yell fire, measure reaction o To everyone’s surprise, when there is 1 person in waiting room, high probably that person is going to try to do something about the crisis, when 4 or 5 less chance they’ll do anything o In Kitty’s situation, typically the case- people watch but don’t do anything, if one person there and doesn’t do anything= bad person o Darly’s insight, part of the issue, a lot of you, don’t do much. WHY? o People were rocked by Kitty incident and experiments and started to wonder about scenario- so went back to Kitty situation and spoke to some who were on their balconies and watched o In all cases, they felt awful, all said they assumed someone else had called 911- but if everyone’s thinking that then nobody did o If alone, can’t assume anyone else- either you’ll do something or no one will o Same as Chinese situation o EX. If you have 100 people walking on St. Caths, and there’s a guy lying there, most would not stop, if someone does kneel down, there’s 99 other people who walked by- what’s normal is to walk by, the guy who stops is abnormal= NORM, unless first person stops and everyone else follows suit, abnormal o For 1 person who stops, 100 others don’t- norm is that you don’t stop  How do groups influence us?  Part of social psychology bridges individual and society  When it comes to asking question what about groups? (except indirectly, culture and norms)that’s not what social psych did  Group for social psych= small collection of individuals, usually less then 10. Asked: would an
More Less
Unlock Document


Only pages 1-2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit