Class Notes (979,377)
CA (576,660)
McGill (34,872)
PSYC (3,813)
PSYC 331 (96)
Lecture 5

PSYC 331 Lecture Notes - Lecture 5: Food Fight

4 Pages
101 Views
Winter 2013

Department
Psychology
Course Code
PSYC 331
Professor
Donald Taylor
Lecture
5

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 4 pages of the document.
LECTURE 5
REALISTIC CONFLICT THEORY
January 21st, 2013
REALISTIC CONFLICT THEORY
The whole theory grew out from a single experiment
o Sherrif camp experiment
Four stages in Sherif Experiments
1. Spontaneous interpersonal friendship choices
2. Group formation
3. Intergroup conflict
4. Intergroup Cooperation/reduction of intergroup conflicts (superordinate goals)
Sherif experiment was huge
The camp experiment was huge and it was so confusing, that social psychologists did not know in
which category to put it and that’s why it is in different chapters in textbooks
The Sherif experiment took place as a summer camps where kids were invited to participate
Stage 1: Spontaneous interpersonal friendship choices
The experiment let the kids form natural friendship for the first few days
o There was no pressure to form friends
After a few days, they evaluate the kinds of friendship they formed
Then, they divided the camp into 2 groups
o They separated the groups by cabin and the only criteria was that for each boy, 2/3 of his
best bodies have to be in the other groups
Stage 2: Group formation
For 2 days, the 2 groups will not see each other
They were all engaged in team building activities with their own group
They never came into contact for these 2 days so that these couple of days were to get to know the
people of their team
Stage 3: Intergroup conflict
Then, the experimenters have them participate in activities that will make one group compete against
the other group
Every single activity involved competition between the 2 groups
The first night, the 2 groups just came together at the cafeteria
Each group sat on their own side and when the food came in, they started to fight
There was an open war fair among 2 groups of 11 years old
Notice what is driving the conflict
o Structuring the situation so that the 2 groups are competing with each other
o
The STRUCTURE is the KEY here

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
LECTURE 5 REALISTIC CONFLICT THEORY st January 21 , 2013 REALISTIC CONFLICT THEORY  The whole theory grew out from a single experiment o Sherrif camp experiment Four stages in Sherif Experiments 1. Spontaneous interpersonal friendship choices 2. Group formation 3. Intergroup conflict 4. Intergroup Cooperation/reduction of intergroup conflicts (superordinate goals)  Sherif experiment was huge  The camp experiment was huge and it was so confusing, that social psychologists did not know in which category to put it and that’s why it is in different chapters in textbooks  The Sherif experiment took place as a summer camps where kids were invited to participate Stage 1: Spontaneous interpersonal friendship choices  The experiment let the kids form natural friendship for the first few days o There was no pressure to form friends  After a few days, they evaluate the kinds of friendship they formed  Then, they divided the camp into 2 groups o They separated the groups by cabin and the only criteria was that for each boy, 2/3 of his best bodies have to be in the other groups Stage 2: Group formation  For 2 days, the 2 groups will not see each other  They were all engaged in team building activities with their own group  They never came into contact for these 2 days so that these couple of days were to get to know the people of their team Stage 3: Intergroup conflict  Then, the experimenters have them participate in activities that will make one group compete against the other group  Every single activity involved competition between the 2 groups  The first night, the 2 groups just came together at the cafeteria  Each group sat on their own side and when the food came in, they started to fight  There was an open war fair among 2 groups of 11 years old  Notice what is driving the conflict o Structuring the situation so that the 2 groups are competing with each other o The STRUCTURE is the KEY here Stage 4: Intergroup cooperation/Reduction of intergroup conflict (superordinate goals)  They used the same hypothesis to resolve the conflict  They restructured the camp  They the
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

You've reached the limit of 4 previews this month

Create an account for unlimited previews.

Already have an account?

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit