Class Notes (837,548)
Canada (510,312)
Psychology (3,336)
PSYC 333 (121)
Lecture 12

Lecture 12 - Ironic Processes.docx

6 Pages
72 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 333
Professor
Jennifer Bartz
Semester
Winter

Description
Lecture 13 – Ironic Processes Thursday October 14 Mental Control - can we control our thoughts to think and not think certain things? The White Bear - does suppressing first influence the expression of thoughts about the white bear? - condition 1 o initial suppression: first suppress a thought then express it o don’t think about the white bear, then think about whatever you want - condition 2 o initial expression: first express then suppress - verbalize thoughts for next 5 minutes, ring a bell when thinking about white bear 25 20 15 1st Suppress 10 1st Express 5 0 Suppress Period Express Period Figure 1. Thoughts of the White Bear - successful suppression of white bear with rebound effects if initially suppressed 6 5 4 Express 2nd 3 Express 1st Suppress 2nd 2 Suppress 1st 1 0 1st Min 5th Min Figure 2. Bell rings per Minute - first 1 minute similar frequency of thinking about white bear - those who were told to think about anything including the bear thinks about the bear but no longer does it 5 minutes later - those who suppressed the white bear still thinks about it after 5 minutes The Rebound Effect - thinking without a focus o told cannot think about bear but not given alternative - negative cuing o what am I doing? o trying not to think about the white bear o everything becomes associated with this task - positive cue o positive distracter  don’t think about the white bear, think about a Volkswagen instead  suppresses the rebound effect 35 30 25 20 15 Express 10 5 0 1st Express 1st Suppress Focused Distract Figure 3. White bear thoughts during expression period - positive distracter lowers the rebound effect Mental Control as an Ironic Process - state selection process: thoughts we want to have o think pleasant thoughts o think proper thoughts o think strategic thoughts Operating process - designed to achieve the above thoughts - intentional (conscious) - controlled - effortful hence if cognitively fatigue will be hard to continue - searches for thoughts matching desired state Monitoring process - unconscious - less effortful o can keep going even if fatigue due to less effort - searches for thoughts that signal failure to achieve desired mental state o as in unwanted thoughts Monitor as an Ironic Process - monitor watches for potential lapses - signals the operating system - keeps the mind sensitive to thoughts indicating failure of mental control - when cognitive capacity is undermined, operating system become limited and thoughts being monitored are no longer controlled - result: monitor making unwanted thoughts more accessible (the opposite of its job) STUDY: hyper accessibility of suppressed thoughts - suppression thoughts make it more accessible - suppression vs. concentration on a target word e.g. house - 5 min later continue task but also word associate task e.g. doctor  nurse
More Less

Related notes for PSYC 333

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit