Class Notes (838,548)
Canada (510,935)
SOCI 225 (52)
Lecture 9

Lecture 9.doc

8 Pages
72 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Sociology (Arts)
Course
SOCI 225
Professor
Rick Schultz
Semester
Fall

Description
SOCA01-Lecture 9 Health and Medicine cont’d: Post traumatic stress disorder: -a new mental disorder of recent vintage -cultural context: -public and private organization they find it profitable to come up w/ new mental disorders -pharmaceutical companies can come up w/ drugs to treat these disorders Vietnam: -war vets started returning home in 1971 and had problems adjusting -the war was very unpopular in America -young men and some women in the war -treated as hardly heroes -recession hit at so no jobs for them -by 1974 many were finding the stress too much to take and many began to believe that their problems were psychiatric and that they had a specific disorder -launched a national campaign and directed it at the APA -asked them to make it a mental disorder but eventually APA caved in and mad PTSD a mental disorder -some scattered evidence that it was a disorder but it only became a disorder b/c of the political pressure -if you are injured usually the government will pick up the tab -the Vietnam vets saw that they too could be eligible for compensation from the government -so the APA made it a disorder and they got compensated -example of a mental disorder being delabelled: -self-defeating personality disorder”i’m my own worst enemy” -feminist community objected b/c DSM is twice as common among women as among men -they argued before the APA that this amounted to blaming the victimwomen should not be blamed or saddled w/ this label b/c the real culprit is partriarchy which makes women feel inferior -the 1994 edition diagnostic and statistical manual dropped self-defeating personality disorder -thus see how politics played a key role -leads us to the conclusion that culture (sociological concept) plays a big role in deermining whether or not you are healthy or not healthy -mental disorders are shaped by thing other than scientific evidence -social values, political forces, professional interests, corporations and their interests -psychiatric labelling -no clear dividing line between mentally health and unhealthy individuals -there’s a sort of continuum -don’t have the tools to measure it -there are a lot of social pressures that get in the mix and they get to decide what and what not is a disorder -culture looms as critical in this process Political sociology of mental illness: -beginning of 20 century, there is one mental disorder recognized by feds and courts -can be used in the courts as a mitigating factordon’t bear the full responsibility of your crime -and so the sentence is produced accordingly -first happened in 1860s in common law -man murdered someone as defence claimed him innocent due to a mental disorder -courts went along w/ it -the more mental disorders we have the more people are affected by it -the most common is depression disorder 1of4 Canadian women and 1of10 Canadian men -if you do vigorous cardio this stimulates the production of endorphins -they produce a feeling of well-being -being depressed is part of life and if depression affects you, you should exercise -Canadian mental health association estimates that 1 in 5 Canadians will be affected by a mental disorder sometime in their life -definitions are extended and expanded to include ailments w/ no detectable biological basis like minor depression and borderline schizophrenia -the list keeps getting longer -psychiatrists are currently working on the new DSM (2012) -consider including post traumatic embittermnent disorder -if husband, wife, boyfriend, leaves you and you are bitter/resentful for too long then you’re suffering from some type of disorder -internet addiction disorder -apathy disorder -compulsive buying disorder -compulsive pathological overeating disorder -hoarding disorder Christopher Lane: -book called shyness: how normal behaviour becomes a sickness What’s responsible for this? -corporate interests -in the economic interests of specific corporate groups like pharmaceutical companies -they create new drugs for medical purposes -thus, they have an interest in expanding the list of mental disorders -ex. Prozac the world most widely prescribed anti-depressant -was then repackaged as seraphin and marketed to women suffering from a newly discovered condition called premenstrual disphoric disorder (PDD) Why?  Eli Lily is a huge pharmaceutical company that sold Prozac and Eli Lily made 1/3 of its revenue from Prozac sales (6.5 billion) -if come up w/ new drug you need to patent it, and for a certain period of time you won that product and no one else can sell it and you make the money -eventually they run out and don’t last forever -in 2001, they ran out of patent protection and they did not have an exclusive franchise on it -thus they came up w/ seraphin which is slightly different for this new disorder -thus can see why corporations have an interest in this expansion of labelling Everyone is an expert: -contributes to labelling as well -self-help literature grown rapidly over the years -faced w/ self help experts (on tv or mass media) -experts played a key role in the labelling of attention deficit disorder ADD -needed a drug to treat this disorder which is Ritalin -it was proscribed almost exclusively for hyperactive and inattentive boys in the classroom -it is controversial, by mid 90s doctors were writing 6 billion prescriptions a year for Ritalin -it’s an amphetamine type compound (ex. Speed, meth kind of like it) -children’s and adults with ADD (CHAD) 600 chapters a 30000? members worldwide -who makes it?  -on friendly terms w/ CHAD and has given them a large amount of money over the years -there is some evidence although highly controversial that people w/ ADD have problems absorbing glucose in the brain -some people have found what is vaguely called a chemical balance in the brain that regulates behaviour -if it a disorder or not is disputable -no physical evidence -problem w/ Ritalinwhen people are diagnosed they are not tested for brain chemistry or chemical imbalance, but its clinical and done on the basis of observation of behaviour -what they look for is inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity -these are the traits that all little boys have -clinical diagnosis is not the same as a biological test -this is why Toronto school want to make separate school for hyperactive boys -this means that many get diagnosed for reasons like boredom (sometimes really smart kids get bored) -sometimes can be due to the fact that children like to act out to get attention -sometimes children are just high spirited -thus Ritalin is given for a disorder that might not even exist -educational institutions like Ritalin b/c it gets rid of behaviour problems mainly from boys -achieve social control in the classroom Who likes this? educational institutions, pharmaceutical companies (pseudagyzi?), the people that do the clinical diagnosis -A clockwork orange by Stanford colbrick?: -about the medicalization of deviance -professional organization benefit from psychiatric labelling -increases their power and income -the more patients there are, the more they make -power: -how do you gain power and control of people -scare mongering by WHO and other organization to create fear b/c when you make people frightened, you gain control -if you can frighten people you can obtain power and control over people -culture has moved in this direction more and more over the years -people in the UK put global warming 20 on the list they are concer
More Less

Related notes for SOCI 225

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit