SOCI 388 Lecture Notes - Lecture 4: Satisficing, Criminology, Atavism
Document Summary
Rational choice theory: rooted i(cid:374) the classi(cid:272)al s(cid:272)hool (cid:894)(cid:272)a(cid:374)"t figu(cid:396)e out (cid:449)ho (cid:272)(cid:396)i(cid:373)i(cid:374)al a(cid:396)e (cid:271)efo(cid:396)e the(cid:455) commit an actual crime), rational choice theory lay dormant for some time. Nothi(cid:374)g (cid:449)o(cid:396)ks! (cid:863: positivism should be able to prevent crime (since they are able to predict who will commit crime, but their programs were not working, not simply due to their programs: but also about the. : some of them had previous experience so they did not need a plan. But if gun not loaded: might not be considered aggravated robbery by a judge: weapon: assessing dominance to get what they wanted out of people, specialization. Therefore even individuals who intend to make rational choices are bound to make satisficing (rather than maximizing or optimizing) choices in complex situations. Positivist vs rational choice theory: classical school: everyone is equally capable of committing crime.
