SWRK 423 Lecture Notes - Lecture 17: Italian Canadians

21 views3 pages
29 Jan 2013
Department
Course
Professor
Ethnicity, Culture, and Social Structure:
-race is biology as ethnicity is to culture
-a race is a socially defined category of people whose perceived physical markers are deemed significant
-an ethnic group comprises people whose perceived cultural markers are deemed significant
-differ in terms of language, religion, customs, values, ancestors, etc.
-just as physical distinctions don’t cause differences in behaviour of various races, so cultural distinctions are often
not by themselves the major source of differences in behaviour of different ethnic groups
-b/c social structural differences frequently underlie cultural differences
-ex. the social-structural disadvantages to blacks and aboriginals-not their culture-made them less economically
successful than Jews and Koreans on average
-much of Canadian research supports arguments that culture is unimportant in determining economic success of
racial and ethnic groups
-differences in annual income b/w racial groups is largely due to factors such as years of education and
number of years immigrants have been in the country
Ethnic and racial stratification in Canada:
-what matters in determining the economic success of an ethnic or racial group are the resources people possess
such as education, literacy, financial assets (as seen w/ the Jews and Koreans compared to the Aboriginals)
-another factor is the kinds of economic opportunities open to people
-ex. in mid-twentieth century Canada was a society sharply stratified along ethnic and racial lines
-people w/ most power and privileges were of British origin
-WASPs controlled big corporations and dominated politics
-later immigrants had less power and privilege (European had higher status than Asians)
John Porter:
-called this ethnic and racial stratification of Canada a “vertical mosaic”
-thought retention of ethnic and racial culture was a problem b/c it hampered upward mobility of immigrants
-thus making Canada a low-mobility society
-by 1970s many Canadian sociologists, as well as Porter, had to qualify their view that ethnic and racial culture
determines economic success or failure
-after WWII many ethnic and racial minority groups were economically successful despite prejudice and
discrimination
-economic differences b/w ethnic, and to a lesser degree racial, groups diminished
-ethnic and racial diversity increased among wealthy, politicians and professionals
-thus, ethnic and racial culture mattered less than the structure of mobility opportunities in determining
economic success
-in addition to the resources a person possesses, the structure of opportunities for economic advancement
determines annual income and occupational and educational attainment
-ethnic or racial culture has little to do w/ it
Canadian-American differences:
-immigrants face barriers to upward mobility, some more than others
-over generations, offspring diffuse more widely across class structure
-Canada has a policy of multiculturalism which emphasizes tolerance of ethnic and racial differences
-United States has a melting point ideology, which values the disappearance of ethnic and racial difference
-Reitz and Breton:
-reviewed a large body of evidence comparing the experience of immigrants in 2 countries
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 3 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+
$10 USD/m
Billed $120 USD annually
Homework Help
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
40 Verified Answers
Study Guides
1 Booster Class
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Homework Help
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
30 Verified Answers
Study Guides
1 Booster Class