HTHSCI 4NR3 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Inductive Reasoning, Ethical Dilemma, Criterion Validity
15 Oct 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Things to protect study participants: disclosure of study design, protecting privacy keep things confidential. Hard for small town: consent from research ethics board (cid:894)to e(cid:374)su(cid:396)e the(cid:396)e is (cid:396)igo(cid:396) to the stud(cid:455), a(cid:374)d that the pa(cid:396)ti(cid:272)ipa(cid:374)ts(cid:859) rights are protected, ensure the risk-benefit assessment for the participants is done. Placebo vs effective treatment or placebo vs harmful treatment. Ethical dilemma in conducting research: an ethical dilemma is a situation in which the rights of study participants are in direct conflict with requirements, the tuskegee study african american male with syphilis. Participants not informed of all the interventions of the study and were harmed as a result. To study the effects of untreated syphilis, participants not given the right treatment even when penicillin was posed as the effective tx. Went on for 40 years as per 6 months originally designed. Ethical principles from the belmont report: 1, 2, principle of justice. Pi(cid:272)ked cau(cid:272)asia(cid:374) (cid:373)ales (cid:271)e(cid:272)ause the(cid:455) do(cid:374)(cid:859)t ha(cid:448)e hormonal influences (eg. menstruation) and.
