LINGUIST 2PS3 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Railways Act 1921, Neurology, Labiodental Consonant
Document Summary
Basic claim of theory refers to articulation in general. When understanding speech our mind interpreting signal by using that as a lens. Don"t need all acoustic info all redundant. Overlap of acoustic cues we expect co-articulation, not noise to filter out but we expect co-art to help process speech signals. Discrimination is easy across boundaries and hard within cats to hear acoustic diffs. People in experiments weren"t exactly pre-selected according to ethics. Ppl with most categorical categorical perceptions so this shows a skewedness in data. Can"t hand-pick best participants and use that data to generalize for the entire population. Humans can show cp for non-speech sounds. Cp is very different from weber"s law and this can apply to non-speech sounds. Audiogram is similar to human"s audiogram which means chins are similarly sensitive to hearing rage as humans (200-20k hz) similar hearing. Kuhl and miller gave reward of water to chins during exp.