LINGUIST 2PS3 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Railways Act 1921, Neurology, Labiodental Consonant

80 views4 pages

Document Summary

Basic claim of theory refers to articulation in general. When understanding speech our mind interpreting signal by using that as a lens. Don"t need all acoustic info all redundant. Overlap of acoustic cues we expect co-articulation, not noise to filter out but we expect co-art to help process speech signals. Discrimination is easy across boundaries and hard within cats to hear acoustic diffs. People in experiments weren"t exactly pre-selected according to ethics. Ppl with most categorical categorical perceptions so this shows a skewedness in data. Can"t hand-pick best participants and use that data to generalize for the entire population. Humans can show cp for non-speech sounds. Cp is very different from weber"s law and this can apply to non-speech sounds. Audiogram is similar to human"s audiogram which means chins are similarly sensitive to hearing rage as humans (200-20k hz) similar hearing. Kuhl and miller gave reward of water to chins during exp.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers