Class Notes (838,386)
Canada (510,872)
Philosophy (1,234)
PHILOS 2D03 (144)
Lecture 2

Philosophy 2D03 LECTURE 2.docx

5 Pages
160 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHILOS 2D03
Professor
Stefan Rodde
Semester
Fall

Description
Act Utilitarianism - Jeremy Bentham 1748-1832 - An action is right if it maximizes overall utility or minimizes overall disutility - Practical problems  1. Rider if no one gets caught and no one else finds out = happiness because nobody knows what you did therefore that seems like the right thing to do. 2. Special duties  disregards family or friends, - Relationship problems, 3. Problems of justice in favor of justice to kill one person to save the lives of 4 other people. Person never did anything wrong so why the consequence for that person? Seems to license an innocent minority for the sake of the majority. If you can maximize utility for the rest of us, by killing one person, than it seems “fair’ therefore injustice because people should be sacrificed for the utilitarianism. 4. Theoretical problems AU – principle of utility  right actions RULE UTILITARIANISM- principle of utility Moral rules  right actions explain which rules we ought to follow and which rules we shouldn’t. When it comes to actions, the right thing to do is to follow the rules. FOLLOW RULES. POU determines whether a moral rules is genuine or spurious A moral rule whose general observance tends to maximize utility or minimize disutility is genuine RU is able to escape problems that AU has. HOWEVER………………………………………………………………………. Is it morally permissible for a RU to steal food to feed the starving children? NO – the RU seems to fetishize rules YES – RU falls back into AU Deontological Ethics Utilitarianism – rightness/wrongness is based on consequences Deontology: consequences are morally irrelevant. The right thing to do could have horrible consequences or the wrong thing to do could have great consequences. Consequences simply don’t matter – Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) CONDITIONES FOR MORAL ACTIONS Must have right intentions – you must intend to do the right thing Must have the right motives – you must do it for the right reason What is the right motives for actions according to Kant? Three men have the opportunity to commit adultery all 3 decide not to do it. 1 – worried about getting caught 2 – loves his wife and doesn’t want to cause her pain 3 – *recognizes that adultery is wrong* WHY? According to Kant, only the third man was morally correct The third man doesn’t do it because it is wrong, even if we can guarantee it that his wife will not find out. The reason why he doesn’t do it is because he recognizes that it is wrong. An action is only moral if it is the right thing For an action to have moral worth, an agent must do the right thing because it is the right thing to do A person must act from the motive of duty - A person must be motivated by respect for the moral law RIGHT INTENT How do we determine what we should and should not do? MAXIM – a general principle which specifies how I conceive of an actions and my reason for doing it EX. If I am hungry, I will eat. – my hunger is enough for me to eat If I want people to trust me, I will keep my promises – my desire for people to trust me is enough for me to keep my promises If lying to a patient will prevent distress to them I will lie to them – the desire to prevent distress in a patient is good enough a reason to lie to them If I have the opportunity to commit adultery without being caught, I will do it The categorical Imperative (CI) - Universal law formulation -  I ought never to act except in such a way that I can also will that my act will become a universal law  moral rules/laws are supposed to be universal if a maxim cannot be universalized, therefore not a genuine rule. MAXIM- if I can commit adultery without being caught, I will do so. - If everyone makes it their policy to commit adultery, there is NO ADULTERY. - If there were no marriages, there would be no adultery. - Cancels itself out. AND THUS CANNOT BE A GENUINE RULE - The maxim which licenses negates itself CI UNIVERSAL LAW FORMULATION Maxim : if I can steal without being caught, I will do so - if everyone can steal, the possession of property will not exist if everyone makes it their policy to steal , theft would be impossible / cancels itself out when universalized this maxim negates itself maxim – if my contacts allow me
More Less

Related notes for PHILOS 2D03

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit