Class Notes (839,092)
Canada (511,185)
POLSCI 1G06 (280)
Todd Alway (280)
Lecture 7

Lecture 7a Nuclear II .doc

3 Pages
76 Views

Department
Political Science
Course Code
POLSCI 1G06
Professor
Todd Alway

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full 3 pages of the document.
Description
Political Science 1G06 2013 II Lecture 7a: It’s a MAD world Goals: 1. What did international security look like in the Cold War? 2. Why did the Cold War stay cold? 3. What role did nuclear weapons play in keeping the cold war cold? 4. What does this imply about nuclear proliferation? a. Is it a security problem or a security solution? What was Cold about the Cold War: 1946-1991 - The Cold war was more than just a military standoff between two military and industrial powers - Both parties also represented fundamentally different ideological, political, and economic systems - It represented a “confrontation between two ways of life” - It was assumed by most, including strategic planners, that the Cold War would continue until it reached a tipping point where armed conflict would ultimately resolve the issue - Yet it did not - The question that must be asked is, given all the antagonisms between the two parties, given their opposition to one another in every area of life, why did a war between the two sides not break out? Nuclear Deterrence - Nuclear deterrence is a security strategy based upon a simple premise: - Any invasion directed at the nuclear state or its allies will automatically be responded to with a devastating nuclear retaliation - In essence it makes the cost of military conflict too high for it to be rational - If this logic is extended to a bi-polar system where both parties have access to nuclear weapons, the net result is that all-out war of any kind becomes less rather than more likely - Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) is the only outcome that could result from either side using its weapons against its opponent - War itself becomes irrational - For MAD to work certain conditions have to be met: - A) Rationality - It is only possible to assume that an aggressive state will be deterred from aggression if the state itself makes decisions rationally - B) Capability - A state has to be capable of responding to an attack with a nuclear response 1 - This means that a state must have a second strike capability: if your opponent is able to destroy all of your nuclear weapons with its initial assault, then you will have nothing left to retaliate with - Because of this, states nee
More Less
Unlock Document

Only page 1 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit