POLSCI 3NN6 Lecture Notes - Edmonton Journal, Mellenthin, Strip Search
10 Mar 2014
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
There is an inherent expectation of privacy involved in any kind of electronic communication, eg. text. Police informant consented to the police installing audio and video equipment in his. Duarte was carrying and upon completing the transaction was arrested, Surveillance should not be admissible and the supreme court agreed, no difference between: v. duarte apartment and the transaction of drugs. participant and third party surveillance. Call and someone wearing a wire, both had a reasonable expectation of privacy, that the person that they were being addressed to would only hear their words! exclusion of the evidence from the trial. If in public, then there is no expectation of privacy. Yes rights were violated, but it wasn"t so serious or intentional that it would lead to the. Talking to people would be admissible (in calls); but not the content: unreasonable / reasonable. Definition - meaning of unreasonable is anything that is not reasonable. i.
