Class Notes (838,375)
Canada (510,867)
Psychology (5,220)
PSYCH 1X03 (1,058)
Joe Kim (989)

1XO3_Classical Conditioning.docx

5 Pages
Unlock Document

Joe Kim

Classical Conditioning 1 & 2 Introduction to Learning Learning  At a more basic level, unconscious, reflexive learning is vital to the survival of a species. o A child only needs to touch a hot stove once to learn to avoid glowing red elements to prevent pain and injury. Two Types of Learning  There are two important unconscious learning processes: classical conditioning and instrumental conditioning. o Classical Conditioning: allows us to associate two related events. o Instrumental Conditioning: allows us to associate actions and consequences. Classical Conditioning Ivan Pavlov  The foundation for classical conditioning was done by the famous Russian physiologist: Ivan Pavlov in the 1890’s and 1900’s. (Classical conditioning aka Pavlovian conditioning).  Pavlov was interested in the stages of digestion, which began with salivation in the mouth as food was first ingested.  Pavlov made an extraordinary observation: dogs would salivate even before the delivery of food in their mouth. It was as if an early step in the process of digestion was triggered even before the food stimulus arrived.  In Pavlov’s famous experiments, the sound of a metronome signalled to a dog that food was about to be delivered. Prior to training, the sound of the metronome had no observable effect on the dog’s behaviour.  However, following training, a dog would begin salivating in response to the sound of the metronome alone. This new behaviour was called a conditional reflex, so called because it was conditional upon training. Contingencies  Pavlov was technically studying a contingent relationship: the presentation of one stimulus reliably leads to the presentation of another. o I.e. A flash of lightning just before you hear the crash of thunder.  When an organism learns the association between a signal and an event, we say that a contingency has formed between the two stimuli.  Classical Conditioning: the learning of a contingency between a particular signal and a later event that are paired in time and/or space. Classical Conditioning  Learning these contingencies is the essence of classical conditioning. When a contingent relationship is learned, an organism can respond to the signal before the event even occurs.  This conditional response is often prepatory in nature and can promote survival. o It makes sense to begin salivating in anticipation of arriving food because it can make digestion more efficient. o Antelope surviving by learning to flee when they spot cues to indicate a lion’s presence (sounds, sight, smell). Terminology The Unconditional Stimulus  Unconditioned Stimulus (US): any stimulus ore event that occurs naturally, prior to learning.  Food placed in a dog’s mouth will trigger a response without any training being necessary. The Unconditional Response  Unconditioned Response (UR): the response that occurs after the unconditioned stimulus. Occurs naturally, prior to any learning.  The specific response that a US naturally triggers-> unconditional response. When a US occurs a UR always follows without the need for any training. Classical Conditioning 1 & 2  The UR is often a biologically programmed reflex or natural response. o The US of food elicits a UR of salivation in the dog’s mouth. The Conditional Stimulus  Conditioned Stimulus (CS): Paired with the unconditioned stimulus to produce a learned contingency.  Is previously neutral stimulus that after becoming associated with a US, eventually comes to trigger a response on its own.  Pavlov paired a CS of the sound of a metronome with the US of food placed in the dog’s mouth.  The CS typically appears before the US. It may take several trials of training which the CS and US are paired before the CS alone can stimulate a response. When this is occurs the organism had learned a contingent relationship between the two stimuli. The Conditional Response  Conditioned Response (CR): The response that occurs once the contingency that occurs once the contingency between the CS and US has been learned.  Initially, the CS was a neutral stimulus that did not elicit a specific response. Following pairing with the US, the CS elicits a conditional response (CR).  In Pavlov’s experiment, the CR is the salivation of the dog. Review  US: a naturally occurring even that triggers a response without requiring learning.  CS: a neutral even that is paired with the UD to produce a learned contingency.  UR: a physiological response that naturally follows the US.  CR: a learned response that is associated with a formerly neutral event following learning. Acquisition  Acquisition: the process by which a contingency between a CS and US is learned.  Pavlov characterized the process of acquisition the process of acquisition as following a negatively accelerating curve.  Although acquisition typically takes several trials, there are special cases where just one trial is sufficient.  Rats have developed special learning mechanisms for food selection to help them survive. Rats are constantly searching for food sources and can run the risk of consuming something poisonous.  As a rule, rats generally avoid unfamiliar foods, a trait known as dietary neophobia. When rats do try novel foods, they will only consume it in small quantities. By doing this, rats are able to effectively pinpoint a specific food again.  This process is made especially efficient by the fact that rats can learn the contingency between food and sickness in a single trial. Extinction Lasting Effects  In theory, as longs as the CS continues to be a reliable cue for the US, the contingency will be maintained.  Extinction: the loss of the CR when then C no longer predicts the US.  Involves presenting the CS alone (without the US) repeatedly over many trials. At first, the CS will elicit a CR. But over several trials, the CS will elicit a CR that is weaker and weaker, until it finally disappears. Inhibition  However, if extinction leads to new learning, the learning of an inhibitory response to the CS, this would suggest that there exist two learned processes that sit side by side. The original learned response to the CS and a new inhibitory learned response to the CS.  If this was the case, retraining between the CS and US would occur at a faster rate. Spontaneous Recovery  Spontaneous Recovery: a phenomenon that suggests that extinction involves a new inhibitory learned response.  Following an extinction procedure in which the CS is presented repeatedly in the absence of the US, the CR gradually fades. Classical Conditioning 1 & 2  However, following a rest period, the CS is presented once more, and it once again causes a CR. This suggests that original learned association between the CS and US is not unlearned. Rather, extinction seems to promote a learned inhibitory response that competes with the original learned contingency. Generalization and Discrimination World War 2  Conditioning in the real world can be far more complex. For example, a signal CS may not be identical every time it is presented. During the wartime bombing of London in WW2, people developed a conditional fear response to the whistling sound made by the falling bombs.  This was the case, even though the particular whistling sounds were different from one bomb to another, depending on the distance, type, and weather condition. Nonetheless, this variable CS came to reliably produce a fear response. Stimulus Generalization  Classical conditioning of learned responses to a variety o
More Less

Related notes for PSYCH 1X03

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.