PSYCH 2C03 Lecture Notes - Lecture 20: Anti-Social Behaviour, Long-Term Memory, Body Language
6 Nov 2017
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Ivs: mitigating information provided (yes vs no) Insulted (yes vs control: dv: aggression against learner (shock intensity, results, control: low aggression, no mitigating info: very aggressive, mitigating info givin: mid level aggression, room for rational thought. Inerpreations: mitigating information has an impact thus rational thought is available, taking anger out on others - not a rational thing to do. Iv: taste test, receive confederates rating on essay, dv: rate confederates essay, results, not frustrated, sober: 1, drunk: 1, frustrated, sober: 3 - 4, drunk: 8 - 9. It"s not automatic, ration thought is a real process. Revised frustration-aggression hypothesis: frustrating experience (blocks a goal, e. g. heat, pain, insults, negative feeling, e. g. anger, aggression, antisocial behaviour. When it"s participants shocking turn sees the shock button and either guns or tennis racket. Iv: anger (yes/no, presence of aggressive cues (yes/no, dv: aggression (# of shocks, results, badmiton, not angry: 3 ns, angry: 5, weapons, not angry : 3, angry: 6.
