Class Notes (836,136)
Canada (509,645)
History (1,327)
HIST 210 (33)
Lecture 9

Lecture 9 - The Perverse Adult, Part II.docx

8 Pages
134 Views
Unlock Document

Department
History
Course
HIST 210
Professor
Steven J Maynard
Semester
Winter

Description
The ‘Perverse Adult’: The Historical Emergence of Same-Sex Identities and Subcultures, Part II I. State Formation/Sexual Formation: Cold War Sexuality II. Late 19 -Century Sexual “Types” and “Kinds” III. The Law: Gross Indecency, 1890 IV. The Police: “Morality Squads” V. Capitalism and Sexual Identity VI. Ethnicity and Gender in Male Same-Sex Identities VII. In Parks, Lanes, and Lavatories: Urbanization and Sexual Identity VIII. Everyday Acts of Resistance Last Week: Highighted the role of print-culture in the maing of particular sexual identity; the lesbian identity. Thinking of sexuality as a historical formation. **Importance of the late 19 cwntury on the making of sexuality in Canada** I. State Formation/Sexual Formation: Cold War Sexuality • In the 1950s and 60s; height of the cold war in Canada • Lesbian and gay women/ men were considered a threat to Canadian state • Russian spies would seek gay males • Thought of them as weak • So they could give up all the Canadian secrets under erotic seduction • To find out what the Canadian government was doing o They got the documents that they requested. The state had blanked out parts of the document. • Book: The Canadian War on Queers: – Gary Kinsman and Patrizia o Long book o Topics:  Notion that homosexual had inner character weakness  Viewed homosexuality as an illness  Same-sex activity had been regarded as a sin, then a crime. In the post-war time it was seen as a mental-illness  Always changing the conceptualization of same-sex relations  The changing views of psychology. At its peak of cultural power/ influence in cold0war period.  In 1951 – that’s when it first emerges om Canada  Getting WW2; that’s when psychiatirts were used to weed out homosexuals in the army  In 1948 parliament passes criminal psychopathic legislation • Said that homosexuals were dangerous sexual psychopaths  In 1954-58; government establishes the Royal Commision on the Criminal, Sexual Psychopath  This insecurity was coupled with cold war sacredness – homosexuals should also be pruged. Political dissidence like communists but also this idea that homosexuals were also a national security threat. • How do you find the ‘Psychopaths’? o RCMP hired a professor from Carleton University to find homosexuals; Prof. Wiggs  Word Association Tests  Long lists of words  Queen; Circus; Whole (hole); Blind; Bull  True or false questions o Most infamous way – the Fruit Machine  A contraption got strapped into; shown erotic imagines  If pupils dialited over some images you were dubbed a homosexual and then fired from the national commission  This never got off the ground  He needed a control group  To prove that this could work they would have to  People refused because they were worried they would be detected as gay o They would send suspected gay people to their bosses office. Hundred of people were fired of civil service during the 50s and 60s o They would go down all departments and tally suspected homosexuals, actual homosexuals. • The more they did research they found that it went way out of Ottawa. • The RCMP would take notes at bar at the Lord Elgin Hotel, known gay bar o By the end had a list of 9000 names o We know that Sex Espionage Cases during the Cold War involve heterosexual liaisons • If it wasn’t really about State Security, what was it about. It was actually about heterosexuality. o How heterosexuality gets to be installed as the hegemonic. We should look at the States involvement (state formation – historical fore that shaped sexuality) o Accomplished by constantly prugong the state  Define the state by default by purging the govt. of queer people. Then left with a straight state. o Keep them from getting in the government in the first place. • Revision of the immigration Act – prostitutes, Homosexuals and Lesbians were including in the list o 1952 • The previous laws focused on sexual acts (sodomy, e.g.) could be barred for having a record of this. But by 1952, homosexuality is a status or type of person. Huge shift. This is not identifying an act. This is explicitely looking for a type of person. It marked out an identity. • If purging from the government of homosexuals and barring them from entering the country in the process of defining the state as straight II. Late 19 -Century Sexual “Types” and “Kinds” • Three Vignettes: o 1866, Montreal. La Presse – Homme-Femme, passers-by, vile passetimes. Slipped quickly back to the pleasures on their kind. o 1894, Halifax. Mary, several of the men she was dating. Mary was in fact Thomas. He strolled down the street and was able to pick up men. o 1898, Toronto. Bell-boys, they can tell you a lot from their own experience. Saying that the idea of Canada as ‘saintly’ is actually true. Oscar Wilde type. • Here links between sexual behaviours and sexual identity • How did we get from acts to identity? o Law  1892 – Canada gets a Criminal Code  Before then there were crimes like buggery, sodomy and those were not sexual crimes.  Was a nother 1886 –indecent assault. Any male person commiting indecent assault upon a female or a male. who thus creating the first homosexual offence.  In 1890 – gross indecency. Criminalized all physical intimate contact between men. Part of the problem, very difficult to prove crimes like sodomy and buggery. Also a higher level of evidenciary proof needed. With gross indecency – just holding hands (two men) could be considered breaking the law  Back to the 1892 criminal – makes them into law III. The Law: Gross Indecency, 1890 • Minister of Justice; Sir John Thompson; bill he presented about indecency. • It was beginning to occur • Not all MPs charged Thompson’s zeal to • Laurier objected the bill because it left gross indency undefined o “It is difficult to know what is a gross indency” • Mills (MP) - Crimes about morality, not crimes that hurt anyone so why are we entering these in the criminal code – 1892. A huge minority view • House of ____ passes the bill. And keeps the vague definition. Any contact between two men. Keeps the prison punishment – 5 years. And it adds flogging to the punishment. • Should crimes of this sort be punished – thought flogging could be a better deal than long term imprisonment. • 1969 – Trudeau, he partially decriminalized homosexuality ‘stay out of people’s bedrooms’ • Allowed the law to be interpreted • Represents a very obvious shift towards a more same-sex activity than a non- procreative activity. IV. The Police: “Morality Squads” • 1886 – Archibald ?, Appoints the Morality Department in Toronto o He is a key figure of the history of sexuality in Toronto o In charge of orchestrating police action against gay men o Houses of ill-fame, indecent assault, liquor vendors, etc. o First report in 1886, made many references of sex between men o Who were the men they were going after. o Documents used – court documents V. Capitalism and Sexual Identity o Key to understanding their experience… was their status as wage-earners  Overwhelmingly skilled and unskilled, working class workers  Reflected the predominance of the clothing, food and printing industry  Matched the economic profile of the city  Labourers were the most numerous  Some middle-class, office workers. Also the periods when Toronto is undergoing its administrative Revolution. – Men fille
More Less

Related notes for HIST 210

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit