Class Notes (838,458)
Canada (510,890)
Philosophy (338)
PHIL 111 (64)
Jon Miller (39)

PHIL111 13/14 WEEK 1.docx

3 Pages
Unlock Document

PHIL 111
Jon Miller

Week One September 11, 2013 The Question - Is death bad? - What’s the more precise question? o Is the state of being dead bad for the person who is dead? Two Ancients on Death - Epicurus: since a person can never experience his being dead, his being dead can never harm him - Lucretius: because we do not view our nonexistence before we came into existence as a harm, we should not view our post-mortem nonexistence as a harm Epicurus’ “Letter to Menoeceus” - “Accustom thyself to believe that death is nothing to us, for good and evil imply sentience, and death is the privation of all sentience;… Death, therefore, the most awful of all evils, is nothing to us… for with the living it is not and the dead exist no longer.” Reconstructing the Argument - Why did Epicurus think “death is nothing to us”? o A state of affairs is bad for a person P only if P can experience it at some time o Therefore, P’s being dead is bad for P only if it is a state of affairs that P can experience at some time o P can experience a state of affairs at some time only if it begins before P being dead o P’s being dead is not a state of affairs that begins before P’s death o Therefore, P’s being dead is not a state of affairs that P can experience at some time o Therefore, P’s being dead is not bad for P Two Concluding Clarifications - The conclusion does not entail that P’s being dead is not bad for others. Nor does it entail that P’s being dead is not bad in any way in which something might be bad but not for anyone, if there is such a way. So the argument does not inhibit our thinking that a person’s being dead is bad in some way other than the stated conclusion - Second, the conclusion is not about death or dying but about being dead. So it does not rule out a person’s dying being bad for the person. Nor does it rule out a person’s death being bad for the person Reliable Resources: - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy September 13, 2013 How to Challenge Epicurus? - If you disagree with Epicurus’ conclusion, you must show that o The process leading up to it is flawed o One or more of his premises is untrue - To employ logical terms, you must show that his argument is o Invalid: truth value of the premises is unrelated to the truth of the conclusion o Unsound: premises are untrue - Sup
More Less

Related notes for PHIL 111

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.