PHIL 115 Lecture Notes - Correspondence Theory Of Truth, Middleground, Ancient Greek Philosophy

22 views6 pages
Published on 19 Apr 2013
School
Queen's University
Department
Philosophy
Course
PHIL 115
Professor
Week 4 29/01/2013 07:19:00
William James‟ Pragmatism
James is a radical empiricist. It is distinguished from older forms of British
empiricism for the following reasons:
1. The mind experiences objects directly, not ideas.
2. We experience relations between objects such as time and causality.
a. There is a knowledge of causality. The problem Hume gave us is a
pseudo-problem. If we end up describing human experience the
way Hume did, then we effectively do not know anything about
causality.
b. James argues that one experiences the relations between objects.
One sees the cat on the mat. One does not see a perception of the
pen like Hume suggests.
c. Experience is comparable to a stream. There is continuity through
time and space.
d. Human experiences unfold over time.
Pragmatism is a new school of thought.
1: The Present Dilemma of Philosophy
We all have a philosophy, or worldview of ideas.
Your philosophical views are the most important attributes that you hold.
Your whole life is organized around beliefs, ideas, and convictions.
The dilemma: philosophy isn‟t strictly objective and rational as its
proponents have wanted it to be.
Follow a rational course of arguments, and let the conclusions be
your beliefs.
Meditations on First Philosophy: Descartes brackets all his previous
beliefs in order to find truth.
James claims that this is not possible; nobody is perfectly objective.
They never bracket their temperaments.
Types of philosophical temperaments:
o Tough-minded (Hume), usually empirical and preferring hard
facts. They are metaphysical materialists with no religious
beliefs and highly sceptical.
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 6 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
o Tender-minded: rationalistic, idealistic, optimistic, religiously
inclined, aesthetical, but unfortunately dogmatic
The tough-minded philosophers overshadow the tender-minded.
This is because we value scientific methodology and technology
more so than poetry. It is more pragmatic to learn hard sciences
over the arts.
Nobody has choice of his or her temperament. If you are a tender-
minded person, you will reflect a worldview that reflects that.
We feel compelled to choose between either a tough or tender-
minded worldview, as we feel that a middle-ground philosophy is
impossible to find.
The choice between rationalism and empiricism is a non-choice that
is almost pre-determined.
2: What Pragmatism Means
Pragmatism: rooted in „praxis.‟ It is a theory of the connection between the
meaning of an idea and the consequences that are borne from their
corresponding actions.
James believes that this is also a theory of truth.
We need to regard ideas as means to ends. All you need to know if an
idea is true is if your mind can grasp it.
The realm of rational thought is separate from the realm of human action.
You have to regard all ideas in the service of our pragmatic undertakings.
Theories are essentially instruments by which we improve our practices.
This includes all theories, no matter from what discipline.
This allows us to make predictions.
Our philosophical pursuits should help us cope with the world.
30: “There is nothing new in the pragmatic method.” He is understanding
his radical position. The correspondence theory of truth is challenged by
his works.
Everything depends on human actions. If a true idea, hypothesis, or
theory does not enhance our practices, it has no value or truth.
All modern rationalists and empiricists are foundationalists. James rejects
this idea.
Our senses are flawed, but everyday experience is still the basis of
human knowledge.
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 6 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

It is distinguished from older forms of british empiricism for the following reasons: the mind experiences objects directly, not ideas, we experience relations between objects such as time and causality, there is a knowledge of causality. The problem hume gave us is a pseudo-problem. If we end up describing human experience the way hume did, then we effectively do not know anything about causality: james argues that one experiences the relations between objects. One does not see a perception of the pen like hume suggests: experience is comparable to a stream. There is continuity through time and space: human experiences unfold over time. We all have a philosophy, or worldview of ideas. Your philosophical views are the most important attributes that you hold. Your whole life is organized around beliefs, ideas, and convictions. The dilemma: philosophy isn t strictly objective and rational as its proponents have wanted it to be.

Get OneClass Grade+

Unlimited access to all notes and study guides.

YearlyMost Popular
75% OFF
$9.98/m
Monthly
$39.98/m
Single doc
$39.98

or

You will be charged $119.76 upfront and auto renewed at the end of each cycle. You may cancel anytime under Payment Settings. For more information, see our Terms and Privacy.
Payments are encrypted using 256-bit SSL. Powered by Stripe.