Class Notes (806,766)
Canada (492,430)
POLS 110 (385)

Politics Lectures.docx

20 Pages
Unlock Document

Queen's University
Political Studies
POLS 110
Oded Haklai

Politics Lecture 01/06/2014 Monday January 2, 2014 Course consists of two parts: Comparative Politics International Relations Article Synopses What is the main theme? Is the first step. The author asks a research question and you have to identify that question. You must write it down in the synopses “in the robustness of utilitarianism, Eva asks ….” The question the author is trying to answer. In the second sentence you should have the core argument, it may not appear in the first few sentence. This argument is theANSWER to the question. The next stage is to find the supporting argument, how she supports the core argument. What kind of evidence does she use to support herself/argument. What evidence does she provide. Agood scholarly article looks at alternative answers to the question. “she looks at alternative explanations and shows that her argument is more compelling than others based on certain pieces of evidence” Library Exercise Preparation for conducting a research paper. Annotated bibliography for 15 scholarly items (you will do the research for research paper, but you don’t have to write the paper) Wednesday January 8, 2014 Comparative Politics - Key Concepts What is Politics? Who gets what, when and how. Something is being distributed, the what. This can be material substance. Or it can be cultural. Or it can be based on language policies. Example: taxation money, how will you decide which province gets how much. Example: which languages are dominant in which countries. There is an element of power in this definition, someone who does the distribution The authoritative allocation of values for a society. This definition seems to be different on the surface but has different elements in it. “authoritative allocation” talks about distribution of values. Lacks congruent, and yet the assumption is that values and material goods are not necessary exclusive of one another. Values may determine distribution of material needs. Values may decide bilingualism because there are minority languages that are valued in their own right. This actively promotes material needs being addressed through values. There are values of inclusivity. Do we want people to make decisions on our behalf? Referendum’s are forms of making these decisions collectively. The process by which groups make collective decisions. The other two definitions have an outcome This definition deals with politics as a process of decision making. Distinction between process and outcome are different. How do you distribute the last piece of chocolate, who is going to get it and how. There is a value element in this also. Ongoing process, we have a collective memory. In comparative politics we are interested in a different level of politics. The state level, and society as a whole. It is about public institutions, the public sphere. Atask, that was done collectively, with limited information, and coming to a conclusion or solution to the task. The things we deal with are consequential in politics. Comparative Politics Ameans of studying politics through comparisons;Addressing important empirical questions about political life within polities/political systems Explaining political phenomenon, such as political violence, social movements, elections, etc. Learning about individual cases and explanatory theory-building about political phenomenon of interest. You need a point of reference, a country that is similar to the UK but does have a constitution and see how it is beneficial. Example: why some countries are economically advances and others do not. Distinct from political theory, which deals with normative-theoretical questions (what ought to be) Distinct from International Relations (IR), which deals with interactions between political systems, between states, organizations at the national level (war, trade, balance of power etc.) Comparative politics are concerned with how people participate, why some people participate and why others don’t. Tries to be neutral when asking empirical questions, but there is always some kind of value element loaded in it. Deals with empirical questions within systems, states, and societies. It doesn’t analyze war between states that’s in the IR sphere. Just as with political theory, these two subfields interact (IR, and Comparative Politics) This is because they can be the cause of one another. The boundaries are blurry International trade agreements, may be influenced by domestic economic interests. Who do we choose to export to. Doesn’t ignore internal influences. Domestic government policy can also be influence by external pressures. Comparative Methods Different methods of doing comparisons: Comparing across countries, regions, time periods to reveal similarities and differences. Qualitative comparisons (small number of cases or single cases) Example: how does having a written constitution influence politics. Quantitative, statistical analysis (large number of cases) Example: is voting behaviour influences by gender (comparing a sample of male and female voters) Doesn’t require in depth knowledge of the cases but statistics about it. Based on the phenomenon they were trying Deductive (begins with theory) vs. Inductive (starts with empirics) Theorizing about how the world works, after the theory is composed you then do empirical work to test the theory. 01/06/2014 TheoreticalApproaches Positivism vs. Constructivism Positivism The most basic assumptions of positivism rely on fact values They argue that there are real, objective facts, that are verifiable in the same way by different individuals irrespective of their values and beliefs. Positivists argue that social phenomena can be understood in the same way, political phenomena can be explained neutrally by individuals in the same way as phenomena in the natural sciences (measurements, hypothesis testing, theoretical formulations) All we need to do is use scientific methods of inquiry to determine which explanations are right and wrong. Constructivists Object to the idea of facts in reality They believe facts are socially constructed. They are embedded in a social context. reality is socially constructed. There is an introspective understanding that provide meaning, attributes meaning to social phenomena. Political scientists cannot stand outside the political phenomenon as political observers, they are part of the political construction. Most political scientists acknowledge to a large extent that our world is socially constructed, but they also believe that there are ways to neutralize ourselves such that we can test in a scientific way yo see if some situations are better than others. Rational Choice (individual interests) This theoretical approach believes that individuals claim according to their interests They are strategic, they are cost effect Some believe that interest is primarily economic Individuals are driven by economic maximization 01/06/2014 It believes that they are goal-oriented, and then look for the best means to achieve that goal. Example: if they want to explain voting They will argue that they choose the party that will best represent their interests. It can also be irrational to NOT vote for a political party because Political culture (collective values and ideas) Political culture refers to the accumulation of beliefs, values, norms, ideas of a society towards its politics, or political life Refers to aggregation of the individual values, beliefs and norms Individuals are motivated and driven by those beliefs. For example: a person that votes for a political party, no because it reflects their best political interest, but because it reflects the values which they believe. Because the ideology is most proximate to their own. Distinct from rational choice, because of interest versus values. Institutions (structures) This approach argues that institutions are the rules of the game in a society. They provide constraints for political action, and opportunities and are constitutive of ourselves. They provide meaning to our context. Example: what make Canadian’s Canadian? Institutions are seen as those rules that guide human behavior. For example: constitutions are institutions and the political behavior of individuals in a society is influenced by the constitution They provide constraints and incentives. Institutionalisms argue that the rules of our societies are in institutions and shape how people behave. They can also be constitutive who we are, and we behave accordingly 01/06/2014 Example; national identity. Economic Development (structures) Argues that politics is determined by economic structures, distribution of resources, prosperity, level of industrialization, trade relations. It will argue things like societies that are more prosperous in regards to the economy are less likely to fight for resources International Environment Domestic politics are determined by international community International trad\ January 15 2014 States Max Weber “a state is a human community that successfully claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory” They exercise these powers inside of territorial boundaries It is a compulsory association There is force and power involved If you live in that territory which the state controls, you don’t have much of a choice other than to be in the subject to the laws of that state. Organizes domination Example: humans controlling other humans by means of legitimate violence. When the state does it, we barely question it The state punishes people that don’t abide by the state. Authoritative decision making institution for an entire society, by which all other institutions and individuals are subject to. States are sometimes challenged 01/06/2014 Example: organized crime is a means of saying that state laws don’t apply to us, we have our guns, and they don’t play by the rules of economic transactions. He presents an ideal type of a state, but doesn’t capture reality. Joel Migdal – distinction between the image of the state (Weberian) and practice (varies between states) Conceptualization of the state, is the distinction between the image of the state and the practice. State has this image of a dominated integrated center of society and controls all rule making, but in practice states are in question about the alternative patterns of authority Example: religious authority. Example: marriage laws – polygamy – some people believe it is acceptable, and the state has to compete with this. Institutions State – the set of institutions that ideally function according to the Weberian principles (bureaucracy, police, government ministries, local councils) Regime – type/system of government (parliamentary democracy, military, dictatorship etc.) Government – the body and the people that do the governing. Concepts Sovereignty – the right to make laws for the country In most countries this is the legislative body But sometimes there is a formal definition that is in the constitution but it is more symbolic. Some constitutions say the people are the sovereign. Sovereignty lies within the parliament Authority – the right to rule Coercive power alone is highly inefficient for ruling Rulers need to convert power for ruling Acknowledging the right of rulers to make rulers. To comply does not mean that you have to agree with the decisions made by superior, but it is accepting that superiors can make decisions on our behalf. 01/06/2014 Society Society refers to all the population living in the boundaries of the state, it includes individuals who may accept or reject the common order, but still share social space. Civil society Operational Organized in the realm between the state and the individual Autonomous from the state State doesn’t control or create them, they are acting on behalf of those who constituted them (the organized social components) In some societies, organizations are created by the state and therefore not autonomous Voluntary memberships Normative Romanticized as a utopian sphere: civil operation to promote collective good Characterized by tolerance, trust, commitment to pluralistic discourse. Civil element is stressed here, but in practice, assumptions about conflict free societies are naïve. Example: the national rifle association (NRA), now consider the pro gun control lobby Both of this have visions about what the public good is, although they do not agree, and think that the other side is very harmful for their society. So restricted that we would be hard pressed to find an organization that is civil society, if we follow the normative dimension. In comparative politics we look primarily at the operational dimensions, not the normative. Is the way for society to check authoritarian power within the regime It allows people to represent their true preferences vis-à-vis the government 01/06/2014 20 January 2014 CONTINUATION FROM WEEK 2 Nations and States State = institutions Nation = people, population Nation-state = state that belongs to the people Often used interchangeably, but that is wrong. Canadian state and the Canadian people, the Canadian-state belongs to the Canadian people. Belong to the dominant nation, and then there are national minorities. Most states in the world have national minorities, which is inconsistent with this premise (very few homogenous states) Self-determination = nations have a right to determine their defining characteristics and govern themselves. Periods of State Formation th Western Europe from the late 15 century Britain, France and Europe – modern states formed In Britain it was a 17 century civil war (glorious revolution of 1688), Parliament is in power. In France – French revolution against the bourbon monarchy, led to the establishment of the first republic. US – state formation was relatively early, with the declaration of independence and the revolution against the British monarchy ending in 1781. China – pre western modernity Traced back to the 14 century. It deals with population that is population from the center to outer areas and followed by a bureaucracy. The boundaries of the Chinese state expanded. 01/06/2014 LatinAmerica – early 19 century In the 20 century – the collapse of empires all over the world Following WWI (
More Less

Related notes for POLS 110

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.