Class Notes (835,926)
Canada (509,504)
POLS 241 (33)
Dru Lauzon (33)
Lecture 3

Pols241 week 3 readings in Textbook Arguing Comparative politics.docx

7 Pages
36 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Political Studies
Course
POLS 241
Professor
Dru Lauzon
Semester
Fall

Description
Pols241 week 3 readings in Textbook Arguing Comparative politics (Chapter 3- State power and the strength of civil society in the Southern Cone of Latin America)  Society centered views of political and economic transformations have never held the unchallenged sway in Latin America that they have in North America. o This is because in the late 1960s the erosion of the intellectual credibility of the society centered “modernization” model of political and economic development coincided with the exhaustion of both industrialization based on Import substitution and the associated populist and parliamentary political regimes that were associated with it.  Bureaucratic authoritarian regimes o Characterized by impressive episodes of industrialization o Proved to be effective at fragmenting, atomizing, and inhibiting potential oppositional collectivities. o The initial period of the BA was one where the civil society lost its capacity to generate new political and economic initiatives while the power of the state grew. o 1980s  Regimes currently having problems of political legitimacy and an inability to deal with the international economic context of the 1980s.  At the same time however initiatives for change are coming increasingly from within civil society  Chile, Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil o All began with periods in which the institutions of civil society, were emasculated while the state enhanced its ability to pursue its own goals. Growth of State Power, and the Decline of Civil Society in Chile (1973-1981)  State power grew while the power of civil society declined o Happened because of the intensity of class conflict during the time before the regime made it easy for the regime to gain acceptance of its project in the upper and middle classes, Fear of Marxist oppression also helped maintain the internal cohesion of the state apparatus, and the nature of the state’s project. o In a BA regime the capacity to lead the regimes political allies depends on the degree that the regime has both “defensive” and “offensive” projects that potential allies consider to be feasible, crucial to the advancement and preservation of their own interests, and dependent on authoritarian power for their execution. o The social and institutional groups in control of the state convinced their potential allies that they had a vital defensive project (continues repression of the Marxist left and the Christian democratic reforms). Also convinced them they had a offensive project that if fully implemented would restructure Chilean capitalism and civil society so that a stable market economy would emerge that would withstand the reintroduction of some representative features of government. o The persistence of fear within the bourgeoisie was important because it affected the bourgeoisie willingness to accept individual policies that hurt the upper class (there were numerous bankruptcies of domestic firms following the drastic tariff reductions and the decline of consumer purchasing power) but were seen to be the necessary cost of protecting its overall interests.  An important indication of the upper bourgeoisies willingness to abandon some of its independent political instruments for advancing their interests was its closure of the traditional party (the partido national) in 1973. o The potential for concerted action by opposition groups in civil society  This potential is related to the internal unity of the state apparatus, the degree of support the state apparatus receives from allies in civil society and the degree of coercion the state is able and willing to impose on opposition groups. All these factors made it difficult for the opposition to make any moves against the regime.  Two other factors  1) the degree of ideological class and party tension within the opposition o During this period tensions were high as the major components of the party opposition were the Christian democrats, the socialists, and the communists. o At the beginning of the plebiscite all the parties joined in an informal opposition alliance, but the history of past conflict and the different ideological bases made concerted action very difficult.  2) structural changes in the political economy and their effects on the capacity of the opposition in civil society to work together against the state. o The Chilean program of “libertarianism from above” was an extreme form of liberal economics imposed by a highly coercive state. Tariffs were reduced thereby robbing the national industrial bourgeoisie of protection from imported manufactured goods. This resulted in the reduction of the industrial working class.  Therefore, the structural base of potential oppositional activities in this important arena of civil society was weakened.  Resulted in a “small state, strong state” situation” due to the fact that although the states share of the economy had shrunk they still remained dominant and controlled and limited possibilities for civil society to mobilize. o Instead of exchanging the right to rule for the right to make money in the classic bonapartism transaction, fractions of the Chilean bourgeoise abdicated the right to rule and severely jeopardized their right to make money in the short run in the hope of preserving class privilege in the long run.  The state apparatus remained powerful through the 1982-3 crises because of 3 reasons. o 1) the de facto unity of Pinochets command over the army, navy, intelligence service and airforce o 2)Important sectors of the Bourgeoisie, even though they no longer believed in the offensive project of the state, still harbored enough fear of the left to be unavailable to the democratic opposition and thus gave its support to the defensive project of the state. o 3) there remained deep divisions between the active opposition. Power stagnation and Standoff: Uruguay 1978-1981 o BA regime came about with the closing of congress in 1973 o 1968-1978 o The state gained power relative to civil society o The percentage of the population detained for speaking out against the police was higher than any of the other countries discussed here. o Before the BA regime o In Chile The bourgeoisie believed far more strongly that is economic and social survival were threatened. As such they developed many ways to mobilize and provide protection.  By contrast in Uruguay: the military had destroyed the major radical claimants to power, the Tupamaros, months before the military closed parliament and installed new regime.  Therefore the Uruguayan military had a relatively weak Salvationist relationship to the bourgeoisie when the military closed the classic instrument of the bourgeoisie, parliament.. o Bourgeoisie defended their interests more forcefully, thus the state planners did not have the degree of autonomy from the bourgeoisie that their counterparts in Chile did. o This lack of autonomy was further limited by the collegial decision making formula used by the BA in Uruguay because all major decisions was made by the Junta de Officiales Generales which contained all fur-star officers from the army, navy and airforce. Thus, it endangered significant internal veto power, opened up multiple lobbying points for civil society, and reduced the capacity of the state planners to implement the policies they proposed on paper. o Potential for concerted opposition o The two parties in the opposition (the Blanco, the Colorado) are not very different in terms of programmatic content, ideological discourse, or class composition. Also between them they have never received less than 80 percent of the votes cast in any election. o They have a history of power sharing that includes some consociational practices. o However examination of the state-civil society relations during this period highlights some limitations to oppositional power.  1) the upper bourgeoisie, although it did not give active support to the state
More Less

Related notes for POLS 241

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit