POLS 351 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Consumer Protection, Harm Principle, Paternalism

18 views3 pages

Document Summary

Without the state, we would be in the state in nature that is so nasty, brutish, and short. The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others, his own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant. Each individual has an entitlement which they possess. Liberty rights not to be interfered with. The question that mill is asking is how much power the state should have. Mill believes in individual liberty but there is justified governmental action. Mill has to exercise authority in a way that leaves room for freedom. Different societies have answered this in many different ways. Argues that many societies have tried to issue censorship. You need one principle liberty principle/harm principle. Liberty principle would constrain the british government.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents