Class Notes (810,849)
Canada (494,298)
Criminology (698)
CRM 202 (23)

CRM202: Week 9 (March 14) - Patterns of Violence Within the Family.docx

6 Pages
Unlock Document

Ryerson University
CRM 202
Tammy Landau

Patterns of Violence Within the Family 1. Patterns of Violence Within the Family: - self-reported spousal violence - police-reported violence against children -police-reported violence against seniors 2. Corporal Punishment in Canada 3. CBC podcast “Shannon Moroney’s Story, Part I” ( - CBC podcast “Shannon Moroney’s Story, Part II” - ( - Also see Look at the Specific Sources of Data - victimization surveys designed specifically to measure family violence may result in higher estimates of its occurrence in the community - the breadth of the definitions used in the survey may also influence the findings - broad definitions of “family” (eg. marriage, adoption, foster care, “step and blended [two families that existed separately come together, re-marriage] family arrangements”) will result in higher reported rates - broad definitions of “violence”, which go beyond physical attacks to include threats of violence and physical and emotional abuse, will also increase estimates. [emotional abuse, threats, etc. might not be criminal nature but are areas of study we want to look at] Note that family violence is gendered [males and females experience it differently and react to it differently, so it’s about the differences rather than the quantity] - that is, it is experienced by, and responded to, differently by men and women - there are similarities and overlaps between men and women, but there are differences which are directly linked to the gender of the victim, the gender of the perpetrator and the gendered nature of family relationships Measuring Spousal Violence Through the GSS (Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, 2011) “Every five years Statistics Canada conducts a General Social Survey cycle on victimization that collects information from a random sample of Canadian women and men aged 15 years and older about their experiences of criminal victimization, including spousal violence. All respondents who are married or living in a common-law relationship at the time of the survey, or had contact with their ex-partner within the previous five years, are asked a series of 10 questions about spousal violence. This includes legally married, common-law, same-sex, separated and divorced spouses.” “The questions measure both physical and sexual violence as defined by the Criminal Code that could be acted upon by the police. This includes acts such as being threatened with violence, being pushed, grabbed, shoved, slapped, kicked, bit, hit, beaten, choked, threatened with a gun or knife or forced into sexual activity. Respondents are also asked about emotional and financial abuse that they had experienced at the hands of a current or ex-partner within the previous five years.” “While incidents of emotional and financial abuse are not used to calculate the overall proportion of spousal violence victims, information about these other forms of abuse help to create a better understanding of the context in which physical or sexual violence may occur.” - Unless otherwise stated, the differences reported in this report are statistically significant. Self-reported spousal violence, 2009 - The 2009 General Social Survey (GSS) found that self-reported spousal violence remained stable from 2004, when the survey was last conducted; similar to 2004, 6% of Canadians with a current or former spouse reported being physically or sexually victimized by their spouse in the 5 years preceding the survey - 6% reported being physically or sexually victimized by their partner or spouse in the preceding five years. This has remained stable since 2004 . - Overall, a similar proportion of males and females reported having experienced spousal violence in the previous 5 years - Similar to previous GSS victimization cycles, females continued to report more serious forms of spousal violence than males. For example, in 2009, females who reported spousal violence were about three times more likely than males (34% versus 10%) to report that they had been sexually assaulted, beaten, choked or threatened with a gun or a knife by their partner or ex-partner in the previous 5 years - Similar to 2004, the 2009 GSS found that 3 in 10 spousal violence victims had been injured during the commission of the offence, with females being more than twice as likely as males to report an injury (42% versus 18%). Among those who stated that they had been injured, bruises were the most common form of injury reported by both female (95%) and male (75%) victims. [women and men report an equal amount of spousal violence, women experience more serious incidents in terms of violence and experience it more frequently] Sociodemographic Characteristics of Victims of Spousal Assault - Canadians aged 25 to 34 were three times more likely than those aged 45 and older to report being physically or sexually assaulted by a current spouse in the previous 12 months - Canadians living in common-law relationships were approximately three times more likely than their married counterparts to report having experienced at least one incident of spousal violence in the previous 12 months. [no direct correlation between age and living common-law] - Canadians living in blended families were also three times more likely than both intact families and families without children to report experiencing spousal violence - Other socio-demographic factors, such as household income and education levels, were found to have had little impact on experiencing spousal violence. - Those who self-identified as gay or lesbian were more than twice as likely as heterosexuals to report having experienced spousal violence, while those who self-identified as bisexual were four times more likely than heterosexuals to self-report spousal violence. - Of those who reported having an activity limitation (such as a physical or mental condition or health problem), 8% reported having been a victim of spousal violence in the previous 5 years, compared to 6% who did not have an activity limitation. - Those who self-identified as an Aboriginal person were almost twice as likely as those who did not to report being the victim of spousal violence (10% versus 6%). - Those who identified themselves as a visible minority or an immigrant were not found to be associated with increased levels of spousal violence. - People who identified as an immigrant were less likely to report being a victim of spousal violence than non-immigrants (4% versus 7%). These findings are consistent with those for victimization in general (Perreault and Brennan 2010). Reporting Spousal Violence to the Police - In 2009, less than one-quarter (22%) of spousal violence victims stated that the police found out about the incident, down from 28% in 2004. The decline in reporting occurred primarily among female victims. - Most incidents of spousal violence that were brought to the attention of police were reported by victims themselves. While female victims were about three times more likely than male victims to state that they had reported the incident to police (23% versus 7%), the reasons for choosing to report were similar for both groups. Reasons For Reporting to Police - The most common reason for reporting incidents of spousal violence to police were: - a desire to stop the violence and to receive protection (89%), - a sense of duty (49%), - wanting their partner arrested and punished (31%), - someone else recommended that they report the incident (26%). Of those victims who did report the victimization to the police, over 6 in 10 stated that they were satisfied with the police response. Reasons for Not Reporting to Police - Among those who did not report such incidents in 2009, the most common reasons were: - The belief that the incident was a personal matter that did not concern the police (82%). - They dealt with the situation in another way (81%), - They felt that the incident was not important enough (70%) Police-reported family violence against children and youth, 2009 - Police-reported data for 2009 indicate that children and youth under the age of 18 were most likely to be sexually victimized or physically assaulted by someone they knew (85% of incidents). [you CANNOT interview adults about children they knew because it takes away the idea of confidentiality and you MUST get consent from children, but those
More Less

Related notes for CRM 202

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.