2 Context for Cities and Sustainability 2 Review.docx

3 Pages
116 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Environment and Urban Sustainability
Course
EUS 202
Professor
Christopher Greene
Semester
Winter

Description
CONTEXT FOR CITIES & SUSTAINABILITY PART DOS Strong and Weak Sustainability:  Herman Daly & David Pearce: having enough resources to support future generations  Paradigm: a worldview  worldviews are shaped by culture, religion, experiences.  worldviews affect how we approach problems, and understand  Rees: suggested that there are 2 competing paradigms related to economics  expansionist: belief that sustainability is best approached through free and open markets (right prices & internalizing). No major changes are required  technological expansionism: technology can compensate for vital depleted resources  associates with neoclassical economics: independent of environment  following this path will lead to more wealth, less social inequity, and more power to lead the environment  steady-state (ecological): belief that the expansionist paradigm has contributed to issues of sustainability. Not independent of the environment.  economy is constrained within the environment ( biophysical limits exsist)  Believe the economy and environment are governed by system dynamics (esp. nd 2 law of thermodynamics: entrophy).  assumptions: economy is highly order, maintains itself, energy transformations result in low quality energy, more disorder into the ecosphere  Natural Capital  capital: factor of production; used in the production of goods and services  natural capital: stock of natural assets; can yield goods and services in the future  renewable natural capital: living species and ecosystems; self producing/maintaining (Ex, timber)  replenishable natural capital: nonliving but can be self sustaining (Ex, water)  non-renewable natural capital: inventories  Weak Sustainability:  neoclassical economics: substitutability  man-made can replace natural  goal is met if equal profits are passed to TNG  critism: many of these assets are not interchangeable  Strong Sustainability:  converting natural to man-made is mostly irreversible  assets passed to TNG not adequate  stock of natural assets*  Pricing the Planet  Costanza performed a study to quantify 17 ecosystem services: $33 trillion US  climate regulation, water resources, soil formation, pollination, food production, raw materials, genetic resources, tourism, recreation  Criticisms: implies substitutability (technology is the solution), assumes market is only legitimate method of valuation.  limitation: social equity=valuation difficult  *PASSING STOCKS TO FUTURE GENERATIONS*  CHALLENGE IS REDUCING CONSUMPTION OF NATURAL CAPITAL, LIVING OFF GENERATED FLOWS, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME NARROWINF THE POVERTY GAP* Resilience and Sustainability  Resilience: describes systems and their thinking- the ability of communities to weather crisis and ada
More Less

Related notes for EUS 202

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit