3 Cities Contributing to Global Sustainability Review.docx

9 Pages
89 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Environment and Urban Sustainability
Course
EUS 202
Professor
Christopher Greene
Semester
Winter

Description
EUS 202 Component 03 – Cities Contributing to Global Sustainability Comparing Environmental Performance of Cities  Difficult to compare cities: a range of problems can be considered “environmental”  Immediate environmental hazards less of a concern in the North than in the South  In contrast, the South exhibit lower levels of energy use, resource use, waste production  North responsible for high levels of pollution and GHG production  Over the past 100 years, the Global North has achieved higher quality environmental conditions (how?) o Largely by importing ecological assets and exporting impacts of population and consumption o e.g. Improved infrastructure carries sewage and wastewater away from cities and citizens o e.g. Emission to water bodies can cause downstream issues (environmental and economic) for other regions  These differences point to a need to distinguish between categories of environmental problems  One benefit is the ability to compare performance of smaller cities  Danger is a reliance on indices that are easy to measure but omit potentially more relevant data  Satterthwaite argues the following example related to air pollution  Sulphur Dioxide (e.g. burning coal): o Frequently easier to obtain data regarding sulfur dioxide emissions o More difficult to gain accurate data related to access to clean water and sanitation o Ease of access to the air quality data (while useful) may take more prominence than the larger issue of sanitation o Risk of exposure to the air pollution marginal when compared to risk of infectious disease  Satterthwaite argues there is a need for better definition of environmental problems  Should not exclude those problems that may present difficulties in obtaining data  Also important: once defined, attempts to improve one category should not proceed at the expense of others  He suggests five broad categories of environmental action as a framework for comparison Categories of Environmental Action  Category 1: Controlling infectious and parasitic diseases  Category 2: Reducing chemical and physical hazards within the home, workplace, and wider city  Category 3: Achieving a high-quality urban environment  Category 4: Minimizing the transfer of environmental costs to the inhabitants and ecosystems surrounding a city  Category 5: Sustainable consumption  Categorization: o Provides a framework for comparison of similarities and differences and how priorities can differ  Framework: o Also helps clarify how priorities change and evolve over time o Population growth and increased affluence  Note an expanding scale of environmental hazard or cost o Personal o Neighbourhood o City o Region o National (or International)  Priorities in the North o Reducing resource and energy use, GHG production o Improving environmental quality o Cannot neglect other categories (e.g. threats of emerging diseases, reducing industrial pollution)  Priorities in the South o Tend to be focused on the first two categories Category 01: Controlling Infectious and Parasitic Diseases  What is the relationship between concentrations of people and disease?  Advantages of concentrated over dispersed population: o Cost of most infrastructure per capita is decreased (better sanitation and water supply) o Cost of most services per capita also reduced (specifically provision of health care, emergency services, solid waste management) o With adequate resources, cities can be a very safe and healthy place to live  Cities with inadequate resources o Poor sanitation, water quality issues, inadequate waste management, health services o Increases the probability and incidence of parasites and disease vectors o Concentration of people increases likelihood of disease transfer o These cities are some of the most hazardous places to reside  Emerging diseases o Not “new” per se, but new in distribution o May have existed in nature or isolated communities o e.g. HIV/AIDS  Re-emergence of diseases previously believed to be under control o Tuberculosis a top causes of adult death  Though lack of resources devoted to public health is a complicating factor  Rapid urbanization and movements of large numbers of people also important o Becomes more difficult to control disease transmission  Control of disease complicated by: o Resistance of insects to pesticides o Resistance of diseases to treatment  In cities of the Global South o Common for low-income groups to settle in lower lying areas (lower value, less chance of eviction) o Frequently near areas where potential insect vectors breed (swamps, wetlands, prone to flooding) o Increased disease risk  Obviously not a technical issue – these problems largely diminished in cities of the Global North Category 02: Reducing Chemical and Physical Hazards Within the Home, Workplace, Wider City  Scale of physical and chemical hazards correlate with o Industrial production o Road hazards  Action to address category 1 depends on improving infrastructure  Action in this category requires improving regulation (not only industry but individuals)  Reducing health hazards: reducing occupational hazards (exposure to dust, chemicals, noise)  Reducing chemical hazards: o Addressing indoor air pollution (especially Global South) o Particularly important where coal and biomass used as household fuel (can also lead to physical hazards)  Physical hazards: o Household accidents (temporary materials, open flame) o Areas prone to natural disasters (tens of millions at risk to floods, landslides, mudslides) o Low income households especially prone to physical hazards (land availability, proximity to employment)  Regulatory approach – a mechanism to address some of these issues o Standards for employers, penalties when standards not met o Traffic control can lead to reduced physical hazards from automobiles o Green-space allotments provide safe space for children  Ambient air and water quality o As cities grow, industrialize, and become wealthier, a need for pollution control also emerges o In 1996 WHO (World Health Organization) estimated 1.5 billion people exposed to air pollution above maximum acceptable o Once industrial pollution has been addressed, automobiles tend to become primary source of urban air pollution Category 03: Achieving a High Quality Urban Environment  Different qualitatively from the first two categories  Focus on making urban environments pleased, safe, valued  Includes: o A focus on open space (parks, plazas, recreation) o Protection of natural landscapes (ecological value, aesthetics) o Protection and promotion of cultural heritage  Category 3 provides an opportunity to combine urban livability with functionality o Wetlands and wastewater treatment o Urban forestry and ecological services (reducing stormwater runoff, air quality, aesthetics) o Urban agriculture can provide open space and reuse or some wastewater  Provision for green space is often low priority in rapidly growing cities, especially in Global South  From a planning perspective, what is an issue if no provision for public space? o Land developed almost exclusively for urban land uses o Once developed (i.e. built environment) it is difficult to reclaim land for public space o Especially difficult if that public space is to be green space or reclaimed as natural areas  Socioeconomics can complicate – why? o Middle and high income groups have means to pay for better access to green space o Includes access to public space and more exclusive forms (e.g. golf clubs, country clubs, private beaches) o These groups have more political weight than lower income groups o Having the means to pay for access reduces pressure on local authorities to provide more available public space Category 04: Minimizing the Transfer of Environmental Costs to the Inhabitants and Ecosystems Surrounding the City  Concerns the transfer of environmental costs to people and ecosystems outside the city o Transfer to the city-region (this category) o Longer distances outside the city-region or further in the future (fifth and sixth category)  Important to note o Improved performance at the city-region level often at the expense of regions farther away  Early city development has a transformative effect on surrounding regions o Land surfaces reshaped o Infilling of swamps and valleys o Extraction of materials for construction (clay, sand, gravel, crushed rock) o Accessing freshwater sources  Generalized result is a modification of the ecology of previously pristine systems  Effect of addressing sanitation o Improving infrastructure o Sewage moved away from neighbourhoods to freshwater sources (streams, lakes, estuaries)
More Less

Related notes for EUS 202

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit