Class Notes (834,991)
Canada (508,850)
Finance (549)
FIN 401 (129)

Project 1 (1) (1).doc

2 Pages
Unlock Document

FIN 401
Shavin Malhotra

Shangara Singh Flora 23/02/12 Ayaan Hirsi Ali Lecture Analysis Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s argues that Islamic culture and Western culture are in fact so fundamentally different, that they are bound to clash. The fundamental doctrines of the two cultures are composed of different beliefs, values, and morals, which ultimately contradict one another. The western culture places high importance on reason and logic, whereas the Islam culture places emphasis on religion, the teachings of Allah, and the prophet Mohammed. To approach the Islamic culture and its difference with logic would be pointless because the culture is derived through religious grounds rather than logical tenets. Furthermore, Western society places a lot of importance on living life in the present, whereas Islamic culture believes in the ‘hereafter.’ She also notes that unlike the west, which somewhat allows people to do as they please, the Islamic culture designates all those who do not follow Islam as ‘enemies’. Consequently, many Muslims see it as their divine duty to convert these ‘enemies’, and if this fails, to engage them in holy war. This can lead to animosity between these two tenets seeing as both lifestyles are differently orientated. Ayaan takes an inductive standpoint toward her argument. Her intent is to build a foundation for Islam and then explains the fundamental religious context of Islam which is used to guide one’s life. At first, as she slowly introduces her concept, it makes it difficult to determine her viewpoint on the topic. She begins the lecture by first listing the different aspects of the Islam ideology. The listeners are taken back to a world where Islam is originated from. She draws distinctions between Western culture and Islamic culture such as the concept of life and death with angels resting upon your left and right shoulder as you make a day to day decision. This way, rather than the listener jumping to conclusions, he/she is able to rationalize it, and make sense of what she’s trying to say. in many situations, all the facts are never revealed, especially if it weakens your argument. In Ayaan’s case, she often makes one reference; Saudi Arabia. Here the bias comes from the fact that Saudi Arabia is a country that mostly practices extremist views. This is why she blames every corrupted Muslim society on Islam. Near the beginning of her lecture, she begins talking about the different obligations that one must meet to be a “good” Muslim, such as not to eat pork, and to abstain for sex before marriage. She refers to the angels on the left and right shoulder that record all good and bad things. She continues to pitch forth the ‘hereafter’ segment about how “enemies” deserve death. These enemies are described as those individuals that do not believe in this faith, for example Christians or Jews. These examples actually support her argument against Islam because one knows that he/she does not need to practi
More Less

Related notes for FIN 401

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.