LAW 321 Lecture Notes - Lecture 2: Ontario Human Rights Code, Intentional Tort, Vicarious Liability
Document Summary
Lecture 2: torts in the hospitality and tourism sector. It is based on common law doctrine and also in statute (e. g. , the ontario human. Nuisance: u(cid:374)(cid:396)easo(cid:374)a(cid:271)le i(cid:374)te(cid:396)fe(cid:396)e(cid:374)(cid:272)e (cid:449)ith a pe(cid:396)so(cid:374)"s use a(cid:374)d e(cid:374)jo(cid:455)(cid:373)e(cid:374)t of his o(cid:396) he(cid:396) p(cid:396)ope(cid:396)t(cid:455) It is fact-dependent, as a balance has to be struck between the right of a person to pursue an activity and the right of others not to be unreasonably inconvenienced or affected; It i(cid:374)(cid:272)ludes ph(cid:455)si(cid:272)al da(cid:373)age, s(cid:373)ells o(cid:396) sou(cid:374)ds that i(cid:373)pai(cid:396) the pe(cid:396)so(cid:374)"s enjoyment: the interference is (cid:862)u(cid:374)(cid:396)easo(cid:374)a(cid:271)le(cid:863) if: If it is non-intrusive, the consequence is more than a mere impairment to the enjoyment of the property: notable factors for determining nuisance, nature of the neighborhood, time of day of the interference; Intensity and duration of the interference: social utility of the conduct, motivation for the interference. What do you think: class 2 fact scenario 1, execotel hotel corp. v. e. b.