Class Notes (837,548)
Canada (510,312)
Philosophy (611)
PHL 214 (29)
Lecture

Chapter 7 Relevance.docx

2 Pages
86 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHL 214
Professor
James Cunningham
Semester
Winter

Description
Chapter 7 Relevance 71 Three kinds of Relevance relations possible between premises and the conclusionPositively relevant premise works to prove the conclusionNegatively relevant premise works to disprove the conclusion Negatively relevant premise disproves rather than proves the conclusionIrrelevant premise neither proves nor disproves the conclusionFallacies that occur in the counterarguments72 Straw person fallacyThe Straw person fallacy occurs when someone misrepresents and argument while trying to counter itThe straw person fallacy can be seen as a violation of the principle of charity which requires that we interpret an argument in the most compelling way that it can be readWhen you commit a straw person fallacy you attack a similar but weaker version of the argument Two ways to commit the straw person fallacyOne is to misread the original argument to pretend that is said something different from what it actually saysThe other is to introduce extra material into the debate it may also undermine his confidence by redirecting the argument to a more complicated set of topics73 Ad HominemLatin for against the personis an attempted to refute an argument by attacking the person or people who put it forthSuch attacks are irrelevant because the quality of the argument i
More Less

Related notes for PHL 214

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit