Class Notes (920,719)
CA (542,357)
Ryerson (30,878)
PHL (631)
PHL 606 (45)
Lecture 10

PHL 606 Lecture 10: PHL Module 10 – Sexual Perversion and Freud and Perversion

7 Pages
87 Views

Department
Philosophy
Course Code
PHL 606
Professor
Christopher Thomson

This preview shows pages 1-2. Sign up to view the full 7 pages of the document.
PHL Module 10 Sexual Perversion and Freud and Perversion
Sexual Perversion
if there are any sexual perversions, they will have to be sexual desires or practices that can be
plausibly described as in some sense unnatural, though the explanation of this natural/unnatural
distinction is of course the main problem. Second, certain practices will be perver- sions if
anything is, such as shoe fetishism, bestiality, and sadism; other practices, such as unadorned
sexual intercourse, will not be; about still others there is controversy. Third, if there are
perversions, they will be unnatural sexual inclinations rather than merely un- natural practices
adopted not from inclination but for other reasons.
"Sexual desire is simply one of the appetities, like hunger and thirst. As such it may have various
objects, some more common than others perhaps, but none in any sense 'natural'. An appetite is
identi- fied as sexual by means of the organs and erogenous zones in which its satisfaction can be
to some extent localized, and the special sensory pleasures which form the core of that
satisfaction. This enables us to recognize widely divergent goals, activities, and desires as sexual,
since it is conceivable in principle that anything should produce sexual pleasure and that a
nondeliberate, sexually charged desire for it should arise (as a result of conditoning, if nothing
else).
Hunger and eating are importantly like sex in that they serve a biological function and also play a
significant role in our inner lives. It is noteworthy that there is little temptation to describe as
perverted an appetite for sub- stances that are not nourishing. We should probably not consider
someone's appetites as perverted if he liked to eat paper, sand, wood, or cotton. Those are merely
rather odd and very unhealthy tastes: they lack the psychological complexity that we expect of
perversions.
What helps in such cases is the peculiarity of the desire itself, rather than the inappropriateness
of its object to the biological function that the desire serves.
We approach the sexual attitude toward the person through the features that we find attractive,
but these features are not the objects of that attitude.
Sartre's treatment of sexual desire and of love, hate, sadism, masochism, and further atti- tudes
toward others, depends on a general theory of consciousness and the body which we can neither
expound nor assume here.
He says that the type of possession that is the object of sexual desire is carried out by "a double
reciprocal incarnation" and that this is accomplished, typically in the form of a caress, in the
following way: "I make myself flesh in order to impel the Other to realize for- herself and for me
her own flesh, and my caresses cause my flesh to be born for me in so far as it is for the Other
flesh causing her to be born as flesh
Sexual desire involves a kind of perception, but not merely a single perception of its object, for
in the paradigm case of mutual desire there is a complex system of superimposed mutual
perceptions- not only perceptions of the sexual object, but perceptions of oneself. Moreover,
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
sexual awareness of another involves considerable self- awareness to begin with-more than is
involved in ordinary sensory perception. The experience is felt as an assault on oneself by the
view (or touch, or whatever) of the sexual object.
Let us say that X senses Y whenever X re- gards Y with sexual desire. (Y need not be a person,
and X's appre- hension of Y can be visual, tactile, olfactory, etc., or purely imaginary; in the
present example we shall concentrate on vision.)
Every real sexual act will be psychologically far more specific and detailed, in ways that depend
not only on the physical techniques employed and on anatomical details, but also on countless
features of the participants' conceptions of themselves and of each other, which become
embodied in the act.
Sex has a related structure: it involves a desire that one's partner be aroused by the recognition of
one's desire that he or she be aroused.
All stages of sexual perception are varieties of identification of a person with his body. What is
perceived is one's own or another's subjection to or immersion in his body, a phenomenon which
has been recognized with loathing by St. Paul and St. Augustine, both of whom regarded "the
law of sin which is in my members" as a grave threat to the dominion of the holy will.3 In sexual
desire and its ex- pression the blending of involuntary response with deliberate control is
extremely important
sexual desire leads to spontaneous interactions with other persons, whose bodies are asserting
their sovereignty in the same way, producing involun- tary reactions and spontaneous impulses
in them. These reactions are perceived, and the perception of them is perceived, and that percep-
tion is in turn perceived; at each step the domination of the person by his body is reinforced, and
the sexual partner becomes more pos- sessible by physical contact, penetration, and
envelopment.
narcissistic practices and intercourse with animals, infants, and inanimate objects seem to be
stuck at some primitive version of the first stage
Sadism concentrates on the evocation of passive self-awareness in others, but the sadist's
engagement is itself active and requires a retention of deliberate control which impedes
awareness of himself as a bodily subject of passion in the required sense. The victim must
recognize him as the source of his own sexual passivity, but only as the active source
A masochist on the other hand imposes the same disability on his partner as the sadist imposes
on himself. The masochist cannot find a satisfactory embodiment as the object of another's
sexual desire, but only as the object of his control. He is passive not in relation to his partner's
passion but in relation to his nonpassive agency. In addi- tion, the subjection to one's body
characteristic of pain and physical restraint is of a very different kind from that of sexual
excitement: pain causes people to contract rather than dissolve.
Both of these disorders have to do with the second stage, which involves the awareness of
oneself as an object of desire.
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
PHL Module 10 Sexual Perversion and Freud and Perversion Sexual Perversion if there are any sexual perversions, they will have to be sexual desires or practices that can be plausibly described as in some sense unnatural, though the explanation of this natural/unnatural distinction is of course the main problem. Second, certain practices will be perver- sions if anything is, such as shoe fetishism, bestiality, and sadism; other practices, such as unadorned sexual intercourse, will not be; about still others there is controversy. Third, if there are perversions, they will be unnatural sexual inclinations rather than merely un- natural practices adopted not from inclination but for other reasons. "Sexual desire is simply one of the appetities, like hunger and thirst. As such it may have various objects, some more common than others perhaps, but none in any sense 'natural'. An appetite is identi- fied as sexual by means of the organs and erogenous zones in which its satisfaction can be to some extent localized, and the special sensory pleasures which form the core of that satisfaction. This enables us to recognize widely divergent goals, activities, and desires as sexual, since it is conceivable in principle that anything should produce sexual pleasure and that a nondeliberate, sexually charged desire for it should arise (as a result of conditoning, if nothing else). Hunger and eating are importantly like sex in that they serve a biological function and also play a significant role in our inner lives. It is noteworthy that there is little temptation to describe as perverted an appetite for sub- stances that are not nourishing. We should probably not consider someone's appetites as perverted if he liked to eat paper, sand, wood, or cotton. Those are merely rather odd and very unhealthy tastes: they lack the psychological complexity that we expect of perversions. What helps in such cases is the peculiarity of the desire itself, rather than the inappropriateness of its object to the biological function that the desire serves. We approach the sexual attitude toward the person through the features that we find attractive, but these features are not the objects of that attitude. Sartre's treatment of sexual desire and of love, hate, sadism, masochism, and further atti- tudes toward others, depends on a general theory of consciousness and the body which we can neither expound nor assume here. He says that the type of possession that is the object of sexual desire is carried out by "a double reciprocal incarnation" and that this is accomplished, typically in the form of a caress, in the following way: "I make myself flesh in order to impel the Other to realize for- herself and for me her own flesh, and my caresses cause my flesh to be born for me in so far as it is for the Other flesh causing her to be born as flesh Sexual desire involves a kind of perception, but not merely a single perception of its object, for in the paradigm case of mutual desire there is a complex system of superimposed mutual perceptions- not only perceptions of the sexual object, but perceptions of oneself. Moreover,sexual awareness of another involves considerable self- awareness to begin with-more than is involved in ordinary sensory perception. The experience is felt as an assault on oneself by the view (or touch, or whatever) of the sexual object. Let us say that X senses Y whenever X re- gards Y with sexual desire. (Y need not be a person, and X's appre- hension of Y can be visual, tactile, olfactory, etc., or purely imaginary; in the present example we shall concentrate on vision.) Every real sexual act will be psychologically far more specific and detailed, in ways that depend not only on the physical techniques employed and on anatomical details, but also on countless features of the participants' conceptions of themselves and of each other, which become embodied in the act. Sex has a related structure: it involves a desire that one's partner be aroused by the recognition of one's desire that he or she be aroused. All stages of sexual perception are varieties of identification of a person with his body. What is perceived is one's own or another's subjection to or immersion in his body, a phenomenon which has been recognized with loathing by St. Paul and St. Augustine, both of whom regarded "the law of sin which is in my members" as a grave threat to the dominion of the holy will.3 In sexual desire and its ex- pression the blending of involuntary response with deliberate control is extremely important sexual desire leads to spontaneous interactions with other persons, whose bodies are asserting their sovereignty
More Less
Unlock Document


Only pages 1-2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit