Class Notes (809,509)
Canada (493,754)
BUS 272 (79)

BUS 272 - Chapter_9_notes.docx

4 Pages
Unlock Document

Simon Fraser University
Business Administration
BUS 272

BUS 272 Organizational Behavior Chapter 9 Conflict and Negotiation Conflict and Negotiation Functional: Productivity INCREASES. Usually cognitive (conflict is aimed at the arguments)  Task-oriented; Results in identifying differences  eg arguing over a goal in a sports game. As long as you focus on what actually happened (he was outside the line when he hit the ball), and not on the people themselves (he’s such a cheat, he does it on purpose!), it’s probably functional conflict.  Eg arguing about how to approach a team project, what to do next, how to present it, etc.  Decreases the possibility of groupthink, and makes teams consider other possibilities. Dysfunctional: Productivity DECLINES. Often affective or emotional; conflict is aimed at the people.  Example: Justice Harry LaForme resigned from the Truth and Reconciliation commission (formed in May). Why?  the panel is "on the verge of paralysis" because his commissioners do not share his vision or accept his authority.  LaForme also accused the commissioners of wanting to make decisions by majority rule even though they were appointed to simply offer advice and assistance.  "At the heart of it is an incurable problem," LaForme said in his letter to Indian Affairs Minister Chuck Strahl, which he made public in a press release.  "The two commissioners are unprepared to accept that the structure of the commission requires that the commission's course is to be charted and its objectives are to be shaped ultimately through the authority and leadership of its chair." FIVE WAYS TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS (on page 319) 1) Forcing: Imposing one’s will on the other party. (Effective but short lived)  Use in emergencies only; on important but unpopular issues (eg. new tax), and against people who take advantage of noncompetitive behavior  You must have a power base that allows you to force.  Eg. Authoritative command (based on legitimate power): Management can use its formal authority to resolve the conflict and then communicate its desires to the parties involved. 2) Avoiding: Withdrawing from, or suppressing, the conflict.  Use when the issue is trivial or unimportant, and when the potential disruption of conflict outweighs the benefits of resolution.  Can be helpful to let people cool down and regain perspective; perhaps use this to delay the conflict, or to avoid it altogether.  Wait for it to go under the rug.  Doesn’t resolve the conflict but sometimes it’s the best way to handle a situation. 3) Yielding: Accepting and incorporating the will of the other party.  Use when you’re in the wrong, or when harmony and stability are especially important.  Also use to show that you’re a reasonable person (you don’t always have to have your own way! Really!), when the issue is more important to others than to yourself, or to build social credit (you did something for them, so later they’ll do something for you) 4) Compromising: A situation in which each party to a conflict is willing to give up something. (splitting up the pie)  Use when the goals are important, but not worth a more assertive approach.  Also use when opponents are committed to mutually exclusive goals; to achieve temporary solutions to complex goals, or to arrive at quick decisions under time pressure.  -Meet me half way.. (Used very often and everyone goes away and feels ok)  Both might not get what they want 1 BUS 272 Organizational Behavior Chapter 9 Conflict and Negotiation 5) Problem solving: Trying to reach an agreement that satisfies both one’s own and the other party’s aspirations as much as possible. aka collaborating.  Use when both sets of concerns are too important to be compromised.  Purpose: to gain commitment through consensus, to mend a relationship, or merge different perspectives. Examples: 1. Requesting a face-to-face meeting to identify the problem and resolve it through open discussion. 2. Developing superordinate goals: Creating a shared goal that requires both parties to work together, and motivates them to do so. 3. Expansion of Resources (expanding the pie): The scarcity of a resource--say, money, promotion opportunities, office space--can create conflict. Expansion of the resource can create a win-win solution. 4. Altering the human variable: Behavioural change techniques such as human relations training can alter attitudes and behaviours that cause conflict. 5. Altering the structural variables: The formal organization structure and the interaction patterns of conflicting parties can be changed through job redesign, transfers, creation of coordinating positions, and the like. Compromising versus Problem Solving eg some students wanted lined paper, others wanted blank paper to write exam answers. Compromising - lined paper for half the answers, blank paper for other half. Problem solving - providing blank paper on exams themselves, AND having lined paper available for those who want it. FIVE WAYS TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS (pp. 320 – 321) Cooperativeness - trying to satisfy the other person’s concerns Assertiveness - trying to satisfy one’s own concerns. All five are use
More Less

Related notes for BUS 272

Log In


Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.