Class Notes (834,252)
Canada (508,439)
Criminology (2,168)
CRIM 101 (452)
Lecture

Crim 101 - 4.docx

7 Pages
112 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Criminology
Course
CRIM 101
Professor
Barry Cartwright
Semester
Winter

Description
Cesare Beccaria (1738-1794) - Torture was unfair – confession might have nothing to do with innocence or guilt - If you were innocent, you were tortured anyway; if you were guilty, you were tortured toom usually twice - If you were guilty, but were able to handle the torture and did not confess, you received the same punishment as someone who was innocent - The death penalty was inappropriate people gave up certain rights when they joined society, but they never agreed that the state should able to kill them- Cesare Beccaria cont. - The presumption of innocence - Specific criminal codes - Limitations on severity of punishment - The duration of punishment as a more effective deterrent - Public (visible) punishment as more effective deterrent Jeremy Bentham (1748 – 1832) - People were rational and exercised free will - Would employ a hedonistic calculus in deciding whether a certain action was more likely to result in pleasure than in pain The Positive School - Used “scientific” methods to explain criminal behaviour - Involved notion of “determinism”, as opposed to “free will” or “rational choice” - Behaviour of criminals was pre-determined by their genes or evolutionary condition Cesare Lombroso - Founded and most prominent member of the Positive School - Interest in science, medicine and evolutionary theory led Cesare Lombroso in search of atavistic criminal – a degenerate throwback on earlier forms of evolution Enrico Ferri - Argued that free will did not exist - Placed greater emphasis on determining effects of social, economic and political factors Raffaele Garofalo - Crimes as being “against the laws of nature” - “Natural crimes” that violated the sentiments of “probity” and “pity” - Advocated elimination of criminals through incapacitation or execution Criminological Theory - Sacco and Kennedy describe criminological theories as general (rather than individual) explanations of why crime occurs - Good or “valid” theories should be logically constructed, and should be consistent with what we know about crime - Theories should also be falsifiable – we should be able to test or measure them Positivism and Determinism - Most theories discussed in Chapter 4 of The Criminal Event are positivist theories - Positivism = use of “scientific” methods to study and explain human/criminal behaviour - Involves a degree of determinism (i.e., the way people behave is due to circumstances beyond their control) Four Main Approaches - General pedigree studies o Look at people who are related to each other, to see whether they behave in similar manner o Assume that children of parents who engage in criminal behaviour are more likely to be criminal themselves, because they inherited their parents’ genes o If one brother is criminal, other brother should have higher chance of being criminal too, because of similar genetic make-up o Problems with Pedigrees  Difficult to say whether criminal behaviour caused by inherited tendencies, or by social environment  Unless raised in different family, with different parents, it could be argued that parents taught children that criminal behaviour was acceptable  Children may learn criminal behaviour by watching and imitating behaviour of their parents - Twin studies o Effort to avoid problems associated with general pedigree studies o Researchers study differences between dizygotic (DZ) and monozygotic (MZ) twins o DZ (fraternal) twins share only 50% of their genes; MZ (identical) twins share 100% of their genes o Concordance = the degree to which behaviour of the twins is similar or dissimilar o MZ and DZ Twins  Studies have suggested that if one MZ twin is criminal, the other MZ twin is more likely to be a criminal  DZ twin less likely to display the same criminal tendencies o Twins can be double trouble  Fail to take into consideration that most monozygotic twins are raised in similar environments, have similar social experiences  Because monozygotic twins look so much alike, they are also most likely to provoke similar responses from other people than dizygotic twins, who may not look as much alike - Adoption studies o Study identical (MZ) twins raised by different sets of parents, in different environments o Control for social class, child-rearing practices, and diet o Muddy waters  Most adoption studies have found relatively low rates of concordance  Sacco & Kennedy conclude there is “no real scientific basis for... the existence of a crime gene”  Others claim there is measurable degree of association between criminal behaviour of biological parents and their children put up for adoption at birth - Karyotype studies o Examine number, shape, size of chromosomes o Focus on existence of extra Y chromosomes, or XYY gene o XX chromosome determines gender in women; XY chromosome determines gender in males o The XYY Super Male  Relatively rare in the general population (one in 1,000)  More common in prison population (one in 100)  Little evidence to suggest that they commit more violent crimes than other males, or that they are necessarily more aggressive) o The Mesomorph  Sheldon’s 1949 work argued that mesomorph was most likely to become a criminal, or to engage in violent behaviour  The Gleucks’ 1950 study of 500 delinquent and 500 non-delinquent concluded that delinquent boys were in fact more mesomoprhic than non-delinquent boys o Crime and Human Nature  Wilson and Herrnstein claimed in 1985 book Crime and Human Nature that offenders tend to be shorter and more muscular than people in the general population  Herrnstein (2000, p.21) has continued to argue that offenders populations “are more likely to be mesomorphic (i.e., muscular, large-boned) o What S & K Say  Ignores the fact that many prisoners lift weights while in prison, thus explaining why they might be more muscular than average  Stronger, more muscular individuals often come out on the winning side of fights, and end up being categorized as the aggressors  Less muscular individuals often come out on losing end of fights, and come to be viewed as victims Intelligence and Crime - Hirschi and Hindelang reported in 1977 on six (then recent) studies indicating taht IQ was as least as important as race and social class in predicting delinquency - Lower IQ could have negative effect on school performance - Could lead to increased risk of dropping out - Dropping out could lead to increased risk of not acquiring marketable work skills Five Different Hypotheses - The school failure hypothesis o Learning disabilities may contribute to school failure o Becomes frustrating and self-perpetuating o Student may become angry and aggressive as a consequence o Ends up being identified by teacher as “troublemaker” - The susceptibility hypothesis o Learning disabilities may result in impulsiveness, inability to engage in long-term planning , and inability to see consequences of certain actions - The differential arrest hypothesis o Individuals with learning disabilities more likely to be arrested, because they are less able to conceal their criminal activities, less able to interact effectively with th
More Less

Related notes for CRIM 101

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit