Class Notes (839,556)
Canada (511,391)
History (261)
HIST 106 (65)
Lecture 19

Hist 106 Lecture 19.doc

6 Pages

Course Code
HIST 106
Paul Garfinkel

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 6 pages of the document.
Lecture 19 – World War to Cold War The Cold War began very gradually, growing out of the end of World War II • Late 1942 German war (racist war) had ended and the allies (Britain, US, USSR) decided that they wanted unconditional surrender • The period of push for surrender lasted until 1945 but by 1943 it was clear that the allies were in charge and Hitler was only reacting • Like WWI, the powers went outside of Europe with involvement in Japan (1940), Russia (1941), the US (1941) – the war demanded more resources than Europe could give. − US and the USSR bore the brunt of supply industrially − US and the USSR were the only states with enough economy and industry to defeat Germany • Accordingly, decisions about the future were made in DC and Moscow • World War II was the last civil war of Europe and cost them world hegemony and autonomy. • The cold war emerges as an ideological war that would afflict the world until 1989-91 [1] Why was postwar Europe already being shaped on the battlefield? Three main reasons why post-war Europe was shaping on the battlefield... 1. The entry of the US into the war (2 years late) established hegemony in the allied alliance. They became the productive arsenal. In the spring of 1941 they enacted the Lend Lease program, which gave arms to the allies in return for foreign military bases. $43 billion in resources provided. Not only decided the winners of the war, but gave US international hegemony and authoritative presence in Europe, financially and militarily. − Gave financial, territorial and strategic support so that the allies could hold out for unconditional surrender − In the Atlantic Charter, freedom, security, and self government laid out by Roosevelt and Churchill with a promise for no land grabs. − Arms decided by Europe first policy decided at the Arcadia conference. Pledged to supply resources for Germany’s defeat. − Landing in Sicily and D-Day turned the tide in favour of the allies and were related to American intervention. 2. June 1941 the USSR was invaded by Germany − Allied offensive began in 1943 o Stalingrad 1942 o Kursk 1943 o Poland 1945 o Berlin 1945 − The USSR remained industrially intact after the 5 year plans even though large areas were under Nazi occupation. Part of the expansion has established industry far East into the country. − Bolstered by population resources and a new generation of military officers − Outside help – Churchill and Stalin meet. After Pearl Harbour, the US extends the Lend Lease to Russia. 3. No formal peace to conclude the war − It was decided what would happen after the war, while the war was still going on. − Everything was decided based on positions of armies in 1945. − Alliances were military and not political – politics and ideology were too thorny to deal with during the war. Much easier and safer to stick with military alliances and leave fragile politics for after, lest they fracture the military alliance. Tehran 1943 – Territorial agreements, Europe divided along a North, South line. Anglo America on the West side, and Soviets on the East side. Finalized in 1944 Yalta 1945 – Romania, Bulgaria, and Hungaria will be liberated by the Reds. Greece conceded to the Western allies. Potsdam 1945 – after the death of Roosevelt and Hitler, the main territorial questions were unresolved as the atom bombs dropped. Churchill was voted out and Atlee and the British Labour Party take over. [2] Why did world war lead to Cold War? Despite the fact that there was a military alliance, there was a great deal of suspicion and mistrust within the alliance as well as a gulf of misunderstanding about what Post-War Europe would look like. The two new superpowers had different political aims. Both sides believed that the other would violate previous agreements. There were also difficult questions like who would govern liberated territories? How property claims were going to be resolved? Who should choose successor regimes? What about the liberated people themselves? What did the US and USSR want? USSR − Aim was for security through re-claiming land lost in the 1918 Brest-Litovsk and Versailles Treaties. − Wanted re-claimed land to be friendly states – frontiers to represent a closed sphere of influence − The problem was that friendly states also included sovereign states. They had to violate international law to get Poland and Czechoslovakia. US − Wanted trade and the potential for free investment and an open markets − To do this they believed they had to undermine the emergence of communism in Western Europe and create a competing sphere of influence. The result in conflicting aims was an ideological clash that assumed the dimensions of an emotional crusade. It also created paranoia – that one was out to destroy the other − Stalin accuses foreign encirclement − US accuses an attempt to subvert free enterprise in the West. Unlike in 1918, the US decides to be active in the reconstruction and defence of Europe − Western Europe feared Soviet expansion − Western Europe wanted mild social reforms − Feared soviet military, and the presence of parties in their democratic system. Wanted to
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.