phil 100 lec 22 + 23 notes

2 Pages
51 Views

Department
Philosophy
Course Code
PHIL 100W
Professor
Peter Horban

This preview shows half of the first page. Sign up to view the full 2 pages of the document.
Lecture 22
Criticisms of Ethical Relativism
Despite its initial plausibility, ethical relativism must face several serious criticisms.
1. Consider the general form of the relativist's argument. It might be reconstructed as follows.
2. What is believed to be morally right varies from society to society.
3. Therefore, what is morally right varies from society to society.
- But the above argument is clearly invalid.
- Furthermore, unless one already accepts ethical relativism, the premise of this argument provides no
reason for accepting its conclusion.
- In general, believing a statement to be true does not make it true.
- In general, a statement is not made true even by everyone's believing it.
- Perhaps morality is the exception here, but even if it is, the burden of proof lies squarely on the
shoulders of the ethical relativist to demonstrate to us that it is.
2. If ethical relativism is true then no one is ever in a position to criticize the moral beliefs and practices of any
society.
- There is no objective standard by which it can be argued that the moral beliefs and practices of any
society are any better or worse than those of any other society (including our own).
- No progress is ever made in these matters. In fact, moral progress is impossible if ethical relativism is
correct.
- The majority in any society is necessarily right if ethical relativism is correct.
3. The problem of the moral reformer...
- The moral reformer is always wrong if ethical relativism is correct.
4. Ethical relativism allows for certain bizarre consequences.
-Consider a small society that is contemplating the rightness/wrongness of murder.
5. Suppose it is true that accepting ethical relativism would foster tolerance of other people's moral beliefs and
practices.
-So what? What' so special about tolerance?
- It might be that here in our society tolerance is generally believed to be a good ting. But even if that is
true, that's just what we happen to think.
- In other societies, tolerance is not valued.
- If ethical relativism is correct there are no objective or trans-cultural virtues, including tolerance.
- If ethical relativism is correct, we cannot legitimately criticize those of some other society for being
intolerant (or bigoted, or racist, or sexist, or whatever).

Loved by over 2.2 million students

Over 90% improved by at least one letter grade.

Leah — University of Toronto

OneClass has been such a huge help in my studies at UofT especially since I am a transfer student. OneClass is the study buddy I never had before and definitely gives me the extra push to get from a B to an A!

Leah — University of Toronto
Saarim — University of Michigan

Balancing social life With academics can be difficult, that is why I'm so glad that OneClass is out there where I can find the top notes for all of my classes. Now I can be the all-star student I want to be.

Saarim — University of Michigan
Jenna — University of Wisconsin

As a college student living on a college budget, I love how easy it is to earn gift cards just by submitting my notes.

Jenna — University of Wisconsin
Anne — University of California

OneClass has allowed me to catch up with my most difficult course! #lifesaver

Anne — University of California
Description
Lecture 22Criticisms of Ethical RelativismDespite its initial plausibility ethical relativism must face several serious criticisms1Consider the general form of the relativists argument It might be reconstructed as follows2What is believed to be morally right varies from society to society3Therefore what is morally right varies from society to societyBut the above argument is clearly invalidFurthermore unless one already accepts ethical relativism the premise of this argument provides no reason for accepting its conclusionIn general believing a statement to be true does not make it trueIn general a statement is not made true even by everyones believing itPerhaps morality is the exception here but even if it is the burden of proof lies squarely on the shoulders of the ethical relativist to demonstrate to us that it is2If ethical relativism is true then no one is ever in a position to criticize the moral beliefs and practices of any societyThere is no objective standard by which it can be argued that the moral beliefs and practices of any society are any better or worse than th
More Less
Unlock Document


Only half of the first page are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit