Class Notes (836,276)
Canada (509,737)
LWSO 203 (56)
Lecture

Canadian Court Structure.docx

6 Pages
93 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Law and Society
Course
LWSO 203
Professor
Marywyatt Sindlinger
Semester
Winter

Description
Canadian Court Structure 1) Role of the Courts Key function: decide the legal cases that come before the court by the claimants according to legal principles Passive: only decide cases brought to them -the court waits for the claimants to bring the case to them -they do not seek out cases Legal resolution to a legal dispute -court only addresses the legal aspect of disputes Express community values through decisions -through their decisions, show what values are important in their community -express community values by showing what is acceptable and what isn’t -legal realists would believe it is a reflection of the physicians values 2) Trials 1 judge Parties call witnesses and present evidence -both sides present openings statements -present evidence (eg. Witness testimony) > the opposition can cross examine the witness > ask leading questions to discount the witnesses testimony Civil cases: A) plaintiff: the accuser B) defendant: the accuse C) liable or not liable: whether or not the defendant has wronged the plaintiff and if they must repay the damages Criminal cases: a) Crown/Prosecutor (the accusers, represent the state), b) Accused: the defendent c) guilty or not guilty: the outcome -not guilty does not = innocent -may be unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt 3) Appeals Parties are trying to establish that the trial judge made a reversible error of law -the other judge applied the law wrong, misjudged, or law and fact are incorrec Panel of 3 judges at Court of Appeal or 7-9 judges at SCC No evidence is called or witnesses in court -not a trial -examine a transcript of the original trial -may examine physical evidence Possible result: A) uphold trial decision B) vary trial decision: change the liability amount, change prison time, change the results C) overturn trial decision: decide the case was incorrectly judged, the accused/defendant not guilty D) Send back for a new trial: they trial was incorrectly conducted or insufficiently, a new trial ordered 4) Preliminary matters Issues that need to be determined prior to trial -E.g. how many witnesses can be called, a bail hearing Also: Alternative Dispute Resolutions (ADR): informal setting, explain dispute to a judge and they offer an opinion on the result if it were taken to court 5) Inferior vs. Superior Courts Inferior courts: powers derived from statute -legislation sets out what types of cases can be heard e.g. small claims court Superior courts: inherent powers derived from King’s authority as fountain of all justice -inherent power: can resolve any type of dispute that comes before them *Except: if a certain area of law has been delegated to a specific court e.g. If an aboriginal is suing the Canadian Govt, the case must be heard by the Superior court of Canada 6) Federally Created vs. Provincially Cr
More Less

Related notes for LWSO 203

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit