ANTH 3690 Lecture Notes - Lecture 10: Evolutionism, For Marx, Nominalism

22 views4 pages
Published on 22 Nov 2011
Department
Course
Lecture 10 Oct. 11. 2011
Structure
The Legacy of Durkheim
Emile Durkheim (1858-1917)
Toward the end of the 19th C, theoretician Emile Durkheim moved social sciences in the
direction of French rationalism. In the 20th C this led to the anthropological schools of
structuralism and functionalism. (p.17)
Inheritors of Durkheim’s innovation are Radcliffe-Brown, Malinowski and Levi-Strauss.
What are the elements which arose out of his attempt to reconcile two philosophical positions,
which gave rise to these different theoretical approaches?
We can trace elements in Durkheim which include an evolutionary perspective as well.
Durkheim is one of the big three
Durkheim • Marx & • Weber
Evolutionism
He stresses the value of studying the simplest societies, those that are the most primitive in
order to understand religion
In these cases, explanation is possible without borrowing anything from any other religion.
He speaks of ethnographers and historians interchangeably - the simplest forms will tell us
what is essential and permanent in religious aspect of humanity.
The most barbarous rite - translates into a human need.
By studying other forms of religion (primitive) we are learning about ourselves.
Echoes Morgan’s ‘germ of an institution’ & that of Mead
What is the philosophical opposition he resolves?
Empiricism - analysis of sensually observable facts
Nominalism (rationalism; aprioritism) - a priori categories (Kantian Position as well)
name things and then look for evidence in the world to fill that category
Can either one of these positions adequately explain social phenomenon?
No - in order to understand religion, for ex, we have to understand the collective
representations which represent the collective realities of the community (society.)
These collective representations are shared and historical - powerful differentiation between
individual and society.
His suggestion is that individual behaviour is guided by this representation - what happens to
change?
does change take place in Durkheim’s thought?
structuralist model that could not account for change
The Cosmos Reflects Society
-not only do humans create this representation of themselves but ..
Makes argument that the division of time into periods reflects human activities, particularly
ritual/religious activities.
Makes argument that cosmological notions of space reflect spacial arrangements in
settlements
Society not just acts as a cohesive point for human beings but also structures their
perceptions of the cosmos.
Unlock document

This preview shows page 1 of the document.
Unlock all 4 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get OneClass Notes+

Unlimited access to class notes and textbook notes.

YearlyBest Value
75% OFF
$8 USD/m
Monthly
$30 USD/m
You will be charged $96 USD upfront and auto renewed at the end of each cycle. You may cancel anytime under Payment Settings. For more information, see our Terms and Privacy.
Payments are encrypted using 256-bit SSL. Powered by Stripe.