Class Notes (808,385)
BUS 3000 (18)
Lecture

# chapter 23.doc

9 Pages
72 Views

School
University of Guelph
Department
Course
BUS 3000
Professor
Linda Hunter
Semester
Fall

Description
Preference Theory and Derivation of Demand CONSUMER CHOICE THEORY (DEMAND) BUDGET CONTRAINTS: - Suppose that the consumer (household) consumes only two goods (X and Y). Given the Prices of the two goods (PX, PY) and the consumer’s income (m), the possible quantities purchasable by the consumer (X o Y o are constrained by PXX o P YY≤ o e.g., Suppose that a student has a budget for coffee and milk of \$100/month. If the price of Coffee (X say) is \$1/cup and the price of Milk (Y) is \$2/litre, the budget constraint is \$1*Q C \$2*Q ≤ \$M00 Note: We can define one of the goods (Y say) as a composite commodity, representing all goods other than X. Budget Line: Definition: The maximum combination of two commodities purchasable by a consumer given the prices of the two commodities and the consumer’s money income Rearranging the budget equation for the assumption that all income is spent gives the Budget line Yo = m/P –YP /PX*XY 0 e.g. The budget line for Coffee and Milk with Milk as the Y commodity is →Q = \$100/\$2 – \$1/\$2*Q = 50 – 0.5Q M C C Since the Opportunity Cost of X = -dY/dX (Recall: Opportunity Cost = the best foregone option) →Opportunity Cost of X = -dY/dX = P /P X= Yslope of the budget line) (=> dY = -P XP YdX) - 1 - Preference Theory and Derivation of Demand e.g. The opportunity cost of a unit of Coffee = -(-0.5) = 0.5 Milk i.e., one unit of Coffee costs ½ litre of Milk Q Y Budget Line Constraint m/P Y slope = -P /PX1 Y slope = -P /P Xo Y Q X m/P Xo m/P 'X1 - The diagram above shows the budget line for Xo PY, P , and the budget line that ensues given a fall in the price of X1to P . A change in one of the prices causes a rotation of the budget line around the intercept of the commodity whose price is unchanged Note: A change in Income causes a parallel shift in the budget line: an increase in income shifts it out and an increase in income shifts it in. PREFERENCES AND INDIFFERENCES CURVES For any two consumption bundles (0 ,0Y ) and1(X1, Y ), define an individual’s preference ranking of each of the two bundles by 1. (1 , 1 ) > 0X ,0Y ) means the individual pre1er1 (X , 0 )0to (X , Y ) - 2 - Preference Theory and Derivation of Demand 2. (X 1 Y )1~ (X , Y0) m0ans the individual is indifferent between (X , Y ) and (X , Y1) 1 0 0 Preference Assumptions 1. Completeness For every pair of consumption bundles (X , Y ) and (X1, Y 1, (X , Y )0> (X0, Y ) 1r (X1, Y ) 0 0 0 0 > (X ,1Y ) 1r (X , Y1) ~ 1X , Y ) 0 0 i.e. The consumer prefers one or other bundle or is indifferent between them. In short the consumer does not make contradictory choices. 2. Transitivity (X 1 Y )1≥ (X , Y 0 and0(X , Y ) ≥ 0X , 0 ) => (X2, Y 2 ≥ (X , Y1) 1 2 2 (where ≥ means either preferred to or indifferent to) 3. Non-Satiation (More is always preferred to Less) If both X or1Y are 1t least equal to X or Y resp0ctivel0 and at least one of X or Y is a 1 1 greater amount than X or Y r1spectiv1ly, then (X ,1Y )1≥ (X , Y 0 0 This assumption is sometimes called the monotonicity of preferences 4. Convex The less one has of a good, the more one requires of the other good in exchange to remain indifferent. [Assumption 1 follows from the assumption that economic agents are rational Assumption 2 is actually an assumption since transitivity need not necessarily hold. Indeed, transitivity for groups of individuals often does not hold. Assumption 3 and 4 are actually assumptions about well-behaved indifference curves. - 3 - Preference Theory and Derivation of Demand Assumption 3 may also not hold particularly beyond certain amounts and Assumption 4 is likely but not obvious.] Indifference Curves Definition: Combinations of two commodities between which the consumer is indifferent (or that give the same level of utility) Indifference Curves Q Y Q X Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS) of Y for X Definition: The amount of Y that the individual will give up for an increase in X while remaining indifferent to the combinations of X and Y → -ΔY/ΔX (or –dY/dX in calculus notation) where Y and X are quantities → the negative of the slope of an indifference curve (for Y on the vertical axis) (Since substitution implies giving up one of the commodities, MRS is a positive number) The Preference Assumptions => 1. Indifference Curves are negatively sloped (Non-satiation) i.e., an increase in one commodity => a decrease in the other for possible indifference - 4 - Preference Theory and Derivation of Demand => dQ /YQ < X or the MRS > 0 -> Indifference curves are not positively sloped (i.e., they don’t curl back) 2. Indifference Curves do not intersect
More Less

Related notes for BUS 3000

OR

Don't have an account?

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Join to view

OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Get notes from the top students in your class.

Request Course
Submit