Class Notes (838,398)
Canada (510,881)
Philosophy (737)
PHIL 2100 (38)
Lecture

PHIL MONDAY MARCH 5th.docx

2 Pages
133 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHIL 2100
Professor
Kyle Bromhall
Semester
Summer

Description
thPHIL MONDAY MARCH 5 2012Scope and AdequacyChapter Eightin both cases the premise in question provides no reason to believe the conclusionadequacy does not work the same way as the other twothe prem may be true supply reasons to believe the conclusion and still be inadequatewhen we take all these three criteria togetherwe have the tools to assess whether or not an arg is sound that is whether the prems are true and the prems support the conclusion Scopeintent of the author of an arg and the context makes a huge differenceis part of that intentwhen we refer to the scope of an arg we are referring to how widereaching its implications are or are meant to be or how strong of a conclusion is meant to be drawnEX An arg about black F150s driven by middle aged suburban men in the Pacific Northwest has a very narrow focus and its conclusions would only be applicable to things of that description narrow scopehow can he generalize Implications can only fit into the description made by the argYet an arg about trucks in the pacific northwest has a considerably wider focus The colour make and model less specific means a wider scopeWider scopeapplicable to more casesScope is important because it indicates what level of evidence and what kind of evidence is required for an a
More Less

Related notes for PHIL 2100

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit