PSYC 3460 Lecture Notes - Lecture 7: Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, Cognitive Therapy, Interference Theory

20 views8 pages
Published on 19 Apr 2013
School
University of Guelph
Department
Psychology
Course
PSYC 3460
Cognitive Theories part 2
Personal Construct Psychology
Constructs are bipolar (two-ended), one more accessible (‘emergent end of the pole’) and
one less accessible (‘implicit end of the pole’)
The more we focus on the emergent end, the more we drive the implicit end into our
unconscious.
Strong focus on emergent pole may cause the implicit pole to submerge out of
awareness
Kelly doesn’t believe that constructs emerge out of language; rather, language is just the way we
learn to put terminology to constructs that already exist.
Ex babies can learn facial expressions, before they can speak.
Non-conscious constructs: (some of how we interpret the world, happens automatically)
1. Preverbal: ‘tip-of-the-tongue’ (trust, anxiety, these sort of things)
2. Submerged: pole(s) not in consciousness (One pole not in consciousness so we may
tend to focus on one end of a descriptor and not the other)
3. Suspended: retroactive interference (if we have a memeory of something and we don’t
have a way to describe it, it becomes suspended. “One remembers what is structured and
forgets what is unstructured.”
Do Role Construct Repertory (“REP”) Test http://tiger.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/
Can see which constructs you use most often, when comparing different people.
Used
Challenges for Kelly’s PCP
Overestimating the rationality of construct use among people? (Jerome Bruner)
Implicates the “choice corollary”
Some people argue that Kelly’s theory assumes people use constructs that are sensible and
rational.
Why is that people stick with what they already know? Rather than testing new ideas may not
be rational, but comforting
Science is rational, but scientists are not. Scientists are people.
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 8 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Are all constructs dichotomized?
Does every construct have an opposite? And if that’s the case can those constructs still be used to
interpret reality.
How does cognitive complexity develop across the lifespan?
Not based on testable axioms.
Kelly’s PCP is still popular for clinical and workplace applications
“Fixed-role therapy”: involves active identification and assumption of different cognitive
constructs
(But is it effective?)
Might hear of this as role-playing therapy. The idea here is for people to maybe get some
insight to the constructs that they use by adopting the perspective of another person. So
if somebody says “im having problems with my brother in law and we don’t see eye-to-
eye on how he treats her”. So you go “out yourself in your brother in laws shoes, and I
will play you as best as I can. Try to think how he would, and the constructs he uses. Try
thinking in a different way.”
Take perspective of another person
Albert Ellis and REBT
Developed rational therapy (Called rational therapy, cuz it focused on rational thinking
rather than irrational thinking, wheras psychodyanmics focused on irrational thinking)
He was criticized for ignoring the role of emotion in this.
People thought it was a cognitive theory and not a emotional theory
So he changed the name
Later rational-emotive therapy, then rational emotive behavioral therapy (or
REBT)
Involves identifying harmful/limiting beliefs, disputing them, and replacing them with
new beliefs that lead to better outcomes
Origins of his theory come from the fact that it’s not reality that makes a difference to people,
but their perception of reality that makes a difference. It’s how people think about the world that
drives their behavior.
Not optimistic or pessimistic theorist, he basically says that people have a tendency to do well
for themselves and bring about their potential. And people also have a tendency to undercut their
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 8 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
own successes. He suggests that people are self-defeating, in part because, they focus on either-
or views of things, we create false dilemmas, we are either an absolute success or an absolute
failure. There is no gradation in between.
Ellis theory suggests a dynamic relationship between all these processes ( thinking, emotion and
behavior)
Basis of this therapy (idea is that we are trying to resolve some dilemma the person is facing),
how this is done is by trying to identify the beliefs that are keeping people from succeeding or
making them view a harmless situation as harmful or threatening. We then dispute those beliefs,
and encourage the person to replace those irrational beliefs that lead to negative consequences
with more positive beliefs or more healthy beliefs that can lead to healthier outcomes.
For Ellis, cuz ppl communicate a lot by speaking, in some ways our emotion gets translated into
verbal thoughts and our thoughts are correlated with our emotion and these get caught up with
each other.
To Ellis, people have an innate orientation towards happiness, to seek out pleasure and avoid
pain. On the other hand, people also have irrational thoughts and dysfunctional behaviors and so
in that way we can sabotage our own potential. There are obstacles out there form other ppl and
stuff and worst thing is that we create obstacles to our own performance; sometimes without
even realizing it.
He says that a lot of these self-sabotaging tendencies come from the fact that we have a strong
need for affiliation and belongingness, and we tend to set up pretty high standards for ourselves,
in part becuz, we have high standards communicated to us by others. For example, your rents
had rules for how you behave, so your raised with a series of expectations. So we internalize
these, “so this is what we need to do, to become successful”.
We are often trying to impress others, we are trying to maintain the image of success. Success is
partially socially defined.
For Ellis, emotional disturbance comes from the beliefs that we have.
Activating events (adversity) and it leads to a consequence.
So this is a behaviorist view. (stimulus and a consequence)
But in Ellis’ view …..
Either the event directly changes beliefs or through the consequences changes the beliefs.
So it’s not the activating even that triggers the consequence, it’s the belief.
Consequence depends on the person’s beliefs.
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 8 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Personal construct psychology: constructs are bipolar (two-ended), one more accessible ( emergent end of the pole") and one less accessible ( implicit end of the pole") The more we focus on the emergent end, the more we drive the implicit end into our unconscious. Strong focus on emergent pole may cause the implicit pole to submerge out of awareness. Kelly doesn"t believe that constructs emerge out of language; rather, language is just the way we learn to put terminology to constructs that already exist. Ex babies can learn facial expressions, before they can speak. One remembers what is structured and forgets what is unstructured. Can see which constructs you use most often, when comparing different people. Challenges for kelly"s pcp: overestimating the rationality of construct use among people? (jerome bruner) Some people argue that kelly"s theory assumes people use constructs that are sensible and rational. Rather than testing new ideas may not be rational, but comforting.

Get OneClass Grade+

Unlimited access to all notes and study guides.

YearlyMost Popular
75% OFF
$9.98/m
Monthly
$39.98/m
Single doc
$39.98

or

You will be charged $119.76 upfront and auto renewed at the end of each cycle. You may cancel anytime under Payment Settings. For more information, see our Terms and Privacy.
Payments are encrypted using 256-bit SSL. Powered by Stripe.